Author Archive

San Francisco Giants Move to Florida? My Chat with the Man Who Prevented It

The San Francisco Giants had a bad year in 1992.  The club finished 72-90, fifth place in the National League West, and were on the verge of being sold to a group of investors in Tampa, who had plans for moving the team to St. Petersburg.

It appeared that the rich history of baseball in the city by the bay was about to come to an end.  But then another group, led by Peter Magowan, a lifelong Giants fan dating back to the team’s New York days, swooped in and saved the day.

Magowan and his group bought the team in January 1993, and the rest is history.  The club signed free agent Barry Bonds to a $43 million deal, and new manager Dusty Baker led the club to a 103-victory season.  Though the Giants missed the playoffs that season, the team had been reborn after teetering on the brink of relocation.

Last June, I had the good fortune of sitting next to Peter Magowan at AT&T Park as the Giants took on the Boston Red Sox in interleague play.  Though the game could have been better (the Giants lost) the conversation was great.

I first thanked Peter for keeping the club in San Francisco, and for the beautiful new ballpark—the construction of which he was the chief catalyst for.

He was very down-to-earth, gracious, and enthusiastic when it came to talking baseball.  We talked about the 2010 Giants (at that time barely over .500, who knew where things would eventually lead), as well as the ballpark itself.

Some interesting tid-bits:

Magowan and the Giants were initially considering another location for the stadium, near San Francisco International Airport.

Also interesting, was the Giants were considering having the ballpark face a different direction on China Basin.  Instead of having home plate face the bay, with McCovey Cove as the backdrop beyond the right field arcade, the Giants were considering having home plate face downtown, with the bay behind the stadium.

I think we all can agree that the right choices were made as to location and direction for AT&T Park.

Peter Magowan not only saved baseball in San Francisco, but is a very nice guy to chat with.  Here’s to you, Mr. Magowan, and those who joined you in keeping the Giants in San Francisco.  We wouldn’t be celebrating a World Series title without your dedication to the franchise.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Tim Lincecum and Brian Wilson: Can The San Francisco Giants Hold On To Them?

The defending world champion San Francisco Giants have a lot to feel good about. 

They are, after all, coming off of their most historic and successful season since moving west in 1958, and they are full of budding young stars just approaching their primes.

Perhaps the two young stars most important to last year’s success, and the future of the franchise are Tim Lincecum and Brian Wilson.

Lincecum has had unprecedented success in his first three major league seasons, winning two National League Cy Young awards and leading all of baseball in strikeouts all three years. 

He has also added what has proven to be the key missing ingredient to many great pitcher resumes throughout baseball history: a World Series ring. 

Lincecum pitched eight masterful innings in the clinching Game 5 victory in last year’s Fall Classic for the Giants.

Brian Wilson, San Francisco’s eccentric, black-bearded closer, has emerged as the game’s best, saving a major league-leading 48 games last year and cementing his status as most feared closer with his nearly flawless postseason performance.

As the Giants received their World Series rings last Saturday night at AT&T Park, the memories of last year’s magical run, along with all of the joy that accompanied them, were relived by the franchise and its fans.

But now, as the 2011 season gets into full gear, the question quickly becomes can the Giants repeat, and looking even further into the future, will this Giants club become a championship dynasty?

The answer may very well hinge on whether San Francisco can hold on to Lincecum and Wilson.

Lincecum and the Giants went through a bit of a contract dispute after the 2009 season, which ended in a pre-arbitration settlement in which the parties agreed to a two-year, $23 million contract that would keep “The Franchise” in a Giants uniform through the 2012 season.

But if Lincecum continues to put up numbers like he has in his first three full seasons, come 2013 (after an arbitration-eligible 2012) he could be in a position to command serious free-agent money. 

Lincecum is just approaching his prime.  He turns 27 this season, and given what we’ve seen from him thus far, he’s only likely to get better.  That’s a scary thought for opposing hitters and in a weird way, an even scarier one for Giants general manager Brian Sabean.

Brian Wilson’s contract ensures he’ll be a Giant through 2012 as well, but again, he will become a free agent following the last pitch of the 2013 season, so he and Lincecum will be free agents in the same year, making it even tougher for the Giants to try and keep them in San Francisco.

Other franchises will have additional incentive to go after the two Giants hurlers, not only because of their amazing talents for throwing a baseball but because stealing them away from San Francisco would break up what has become arguably the best all-around pitching staff, top to bottom, in the game. 

It’s almost like Teddy Roosevelt breaking up the railroad monopoly in the early 20th century.

The question of whether the Giants can repeat as world champions has been hotly debated this past offseason, but perhaps the more crucial one is whether or not the Giants be able to keep their pitching staff together in the long-run by locking up its most valuable arms.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Barry Bonds and Steroids Deprived MLB Fans of More Than We Realize

Barry Bonds awaits his fate in a federal courthouse in San Francisco for allegedly lying about knowingly using steroids.

Whatever the outcome of that case, one thing is for certain: Bonds deprived us of more than we know as baseball fans.  It’s not just the asterisks that we attach to the records Bonds broke; it’s more than that.  It’s what he didn’t allow us to see: a great player who achieved so much through natural ability and dedication to his craft, who then got older and slowed down.

That’s right.  We didn’t get to see Barry decline, and that’s not fair to the game of baseball or its fans.

One of the biggest reasons baseball is America’s pastime—the game of our forefathers, and now our game—is because we can identify with those who compete on the diamond.  We see ourselves in so many of our heroes on the baseball field, both in their triumphs and defeats.  We see men who toil in the minor leagues for years and years before finally getting their shot on the big stage under the bright lights.  We see those who have such a beautiful, natural gift for the game, that it’s simply a joy to watch them display that day-in and day-out.

That’s why we see movies like “The Rookie” (where a middle-aged high school baseball coach gets a chance in the big leagues in his 40s) and “The Natural” (where Robert Redford plays Roy Hobbs, “the greatest there ever was”).

We see tragedy, as when Lou Gehrig caught “a bad break”, being diagnosed with ALS (thereafter named “Lou Gherig’s disease”), forcing him into early retirement and, rapidly, into an early exit from this life.  We see triumph, like when hobbled pinch-hitter Kirk Gibson of the Dodgers limped to home plate in Game 1 of the 1988 World Series to face the toughest closer in the game, Dennis Eckersley, and homered to win it for Los Angeles, propelling the underdog Dodgers to a world championship over the heavily-favored Athletics.

These moments remind us of our own challenges, fears, failures, courage, and triumphs.  We gain strength by seeing a man hit a round ball with a round bat, while other men chase that ball down.  Baseball mimics life, and beautifully at that.  That’s why we’re so addicted to it.  It gives us something to remind us of who we are and what we can achieve.

One of the most important lessons we learn from baseball is that nothing lasts forever.  It’s true in the game, and it’s true in life.  Our heroes of the diamond are great ballplayers for 10, maybe even 15 years, but then they start to fade and their skills begin to erode right before our eyes.  Willie Mays may have said it best, from the perspective of one of the greatest of all-time: “Growing old is just a helpless hurt.”  The 41-year-old Mays said that after he had fallen in the outfield during the 1973 World Series, when he was a member of the New York Mets.  It was clear that diminishing skills and an aging body were even catching up with the Say Hey Kid.

Willie Mays is just one of many great players in baseball history that were among the best in the game during their primes, but whose ability faded with the passage of time, helping us see that we should make the most of what we have in life, and more than that, the most of what we have to give.  More recently, we’ve seen some of the greatest players of our own generation hang up the spikes after coming to the realization that they just don’t have enough anymore.

Chief among them: Ken Griffey, Jr.  Junior Griffey was perhaps the greatest player of the 1990s, and were it not for numerous injuries that plagued him later in his career, he would have very likely passed Hank Aaron on the all-time home run list.  Griffey finished with 630 home runs, and was a 12-time all-star and 10-time Gold Glove award winner.  But in the last few seasons of his career, he changed physically, visibly gaining weight, as well as on the field, becoming a designated hitter rather than patrolling his usual center field territory with the Seattle Mariners.  It was rumored last season, before he retired, that he fell asleep in the clubhouse during a Mariners game.

But Griffey’s limitations were, in a way, refreshing to witness.  It was clear that time had caught up with the former superstar, and the myriad injuries that hindered him during his career showed that he is, indeed, human.  By 2009, it was clear that Griffey was in decline.  In 117 games for the Mariners that season, he hit just .214 with 57 RBI.  The Kid retired in 2010 after a storied big league career, leaving a legacy as one of the most beloved stars in baseball history—in Seattle and around the baseball world.

And then there’s Barry Bonds.

From 1986, when Bonds broke into the big leagues, through 1998 (the year before he allegedly began using steroids), he was an eight-time all-star, three-time National League MVP, seven-time Silver Slugger award-winner, and eight-time Gold Glove award winner.

Those are first ballot Hall of Fame numbers.

Then in 1999 things began to change.  Bonds body went through extraordinary changes.  He bulked up immensely, and his head, hands and feet appeared to have grown as well.  Before 1999, the most home runs Bonds had ever hit in a single season was 46 in 1993.  In 2000 he hit 49.  Then in 2001, he hit 73.  In that season, he only had 49 singles.  47% of his hits were homers, and 69% of hits were extra-base hits.  These numbers were mind-boggling, especially for a man who was now 37 years old.

How does a ballplayer who never hit more than 46 homers in a season in his 20s hit 73 when he was almost 40?  Well, we all know the story.

And it’s a sad one.  Baseball is a game for the common man, and it should be played by the common man—not one who has added artificial strength to excel past his peers in the sport.

In a strange way, we want to—no, we need to—see our heroes decline.  It shows us truth, and it shows us integrity and grace from those like Willie Mays and Ken Griffey, Jr., who played with what they naturally had.  They thrilled us with their natural abilities while in their prime, and we watched in sadness but with great respect and admiration when they struggled through their decline.

Outside of San Francisco, and perhaps even somewhere inside as well, there was no respect or admiration for what Bonds did.

He may have hit a lot of home runs.  But he did not give us what we wanted to see.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


San Francisco Giants: Still Better Than the Philadelphia Phillies

Ask most baseball pundits and they’ll tell you that the team to beat in the National League is the Philadelphia Phillies.

Why?

Well, the only major pickup the Phillies made this offseason was left-hander Cliff Lee. Lee dominated the Rays and Yankees in the 2010 American League Divisional and Championship Series before taking the mound against the Giants in the World Series last year.

To describe Lee’s performance in the first two rounds of the playoffs as “dominating” is truly an understatement. In three starts between the ALDS against Tampa Bay and the ALCS against New York, Lee was 3-0 with a 1.13 ERA. He struck out 34 and walked just one.

Based on these numbers by themselves, the addition of Lee to a Philadelphia staff that already features Roy Halladay, Cole Hamels and Roy Oswalt would no doubt make Philadelphia the favorite not only to win the NL East, but to go deep into the playoffs with great potential for World Series glory.

But that picture leaves out a minor detail: the 2010 World Series, and its winner—the San Francisco Giants.

The aforementioned Lee—with phenomenal postseason numbers entering the Fall Classic—was anything but phenomenal against the San Francisco Giants, the National League Champions and the underdog in their matchup with Lee’s Texas Rangers.

Lee’s numbers in his two World Series starts against San Francisco? 0-2 with a 6.94 ERA.

Lee had nine earned runs on 14 hits, including the three-run home run by World Series MVP Edgar Renteria that sealed the title for San Francisco.

So how about those Giants?

Can they really contend against the Phillies for another title in 2011? Let’s take a look at how the other members of “the big four” on Philadelphia’s starting staff fared against San Francisco in 2010:

 

Roy Halladay

On April 26, 2010 the undefeated Roy Halladay took the mound at AT&T Park in San Francisco to face the Giants. By the end of the night, his Phillies were on the short end of a 5-1 outcome. Halladay went seven innings, gave up five runs on 10 hits and took his first loss of the season.

In the postseason, Halladay faced the Giants twice. He was 1-1 with a 4.15 ERA. In Game 1 of the NLCS, Halladay was shelled for four runs on eight hits in seven innings in Philadelphia. And the Giants took the all-important opening contest in that best-of-seven series.

 

Cole Hamels

Next in line is Cole Hamels. On April 28, 2010, Hamels faced the Giants in San Francisco. He gave up four runs on nine hits in six innings, getting a no-decision. Hamels faced the Giants again on August 19 in Philadelphia. He gave up five runs on seven hits in five innings pitched, taking the loss.

In the NLCS, Hamels gave up two runs on three hits in four innings of work, taking the loss in Game 3.

 

Roy Oswalt

Roy Oswalt spent most of the season with Houston before being traded to Philadelphia for the stretch run. He faced the Giants four times during the regular season. He went 1-3 with a 3.85 ERA.

In the LCS, Oswalt fared better against San Francisco, going 1-1 with a 1.84 ERA. The one loss, however, was in relief, when Oswalt was summoned from the bullpen to preserve a 5-5 tie in the bottom of the ninth. Giants shortstop Juan Uribe hit a walk-off sacrifice fly to give San Francisco a 3-1 series lead.

In 2010, the Giants defeated Cliff Lee, Roy Halladay and Cole Hamels twice each, and Roy Oswalt four times, en route to their first World Series title in 56 years. Now that Cliff Lee is a Phillie, why should that mean that Philadelphia is any more likely to get past San Francisco should the two clubs meet in October?

 

Is It the Offense?

Perhaps it’s the Phillies’ formidable offense. With the likes of Shane Victorino, Chase Utley, Ryan Howard and Placido Polanco, what pitching staff wouldn’t quiver at the thought of facing this vaunted Philadelphia lineup?

The answer is the staff from San Francisco.

During the regular season, the Phillies hit .260 and scored 4.76 runs per game. In the LCS against the Giants, they hit just .216 and scored 3.3 runs/game. They also struck out 56 times—roughly nine Ks in each game of the series, or one strikeout every 3.39 at-bats.

Further, the Phillies lost slugging right fielder Jayson Werth to free agency this offseason, as he signed with the Washington Nationals.

Meanwhile, nearly all of San Francisco’s starters are returning for 2011, with the exception of Juan Uribe (Dodgers) and Edgar Renteria (Reds). They have added veteran shortstop and former AL MVP Miguel Tejada at shortstop. They’ll also have 2010 NL Rookie of the Year Buster Posey and World Series Game-4 winner Madison Bumgarner—both midseason call-ups from Triple-A last year—for the entire season.

 

Giants’ X-Factor

Finally, the X-factor for the Giants this season could be slugging first baseman Brandon Belt. Belt hit .352 with 23 homers in the minor leagues last year, and made the big league club for 2011. 

He’s already shown his amazing offensive potential, blasting a three-run home run against the Dodgers during the opening weekend of the season.  If Belt turns out to be another Buster Posey, the youth movement in San Francisco could continue to spark the Giants this season.

 

2011 NLCS?  Giants Over Phillies

If there’s a rematch in the 2011 National League Championship Series, I like the Giants.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Copyright © 1996-2010 Kuzul. All rights reserved.
iDream theme by Templates Next | Powered by WordPress