Tag: Baseball Hall of Fame

Bert Blyleven: Pitching History and The Hall of Fame

As we approach the voting results for the Hall of Fame this year, Bert Blyleven‘s case deserves one more look.  It has been a long and arduous path for Blyleven gaining votes almost yearly until last year he was but five votes short of induction to baseball’s highest honor.  This path reminds me of his career — 4970 innings, twice fighting back from injury to reclaim excellence.

What makes a HOF pitcher?  In the sake of brevity, it is some combination of domination, excellence and endurance that puts a pitcher over the line for Cooperstown.  Historically, it has been measured in different ways. 

Some pitchers had brief brilliant careers, (Sandy Koufax, Addie Joss, Lefty Gomez, Dizzy Dean.)  Others have had careers of high quality — Juan Marichal, Jim Palmer, Carl Hubbell; and others have passed automatic milestones like 300 wins, or perhaps a more recent 3000 strikeouts. (Early Wynn, Bob Gibson)

The base minimum for wins to be considered for the HOF has been 200 wins — Hal Newhouser, Bob Lemon, Don Drysdale are examples of pitchers with win totals in the low 200s.  This is in contrast to 300 wins, which has been an automatic induction total.

So, Bert Blyleven‘s 287 should in no way prevent him from the HOF.  If anything it should strongly recommend him for the HOF.  His adjusted total of wins, called Neutral wins, is 313, and Baseball Reference had it figured to 325.  This is how many wins he would have had with even league average runs support throughout his career.  His losses would have been reduced to 227, and the whole debate over his qualifications and winning percentage would be a moot point.

Basically, the viewpoint of the writers from his era that he was just a good pitcher, but not great or dominant came from his W-L records over his first eight years of his career.  So, a year like 1973, when he led all players in WAR (not just pitchers!) with 9.1, he finished seventh in the Cy Young voting with a 20-17 record.  He deserved, or pitched well enough to win the award.

That year he was the best pitcher in baseball. Similarly, King Felix Hernandez won the Cy Young this year with a 13-12 record. So people that say he was never dominant are just basically wrong from the get go. The W-L records near .500 came from his poor run support during this time.

I personally can’t think of three stats that demonstrate domination and quality like strikeouts, strikeout to walk ratio, and career complete game shutouts.

First, let’s establish the quality of the work Blyleven produced during his 4970 inning career.  The great command stat is the K/BB ratio. The pitchers with the greatest “stuff” and command of the strike zone have put up the highest marks in this category.  These are the great command pitchers throughout history.

In the dead ball era it was Christy Mathewson leading the way with a mark of 2.96.  He did this over 4600 innings.  Right behind him were pitchers with shorter careers but great command, Ed Walsh, and Rube Waddell.  So the title from this period goes to Mathewson for the best ratio and the longest career.

In the live ball era, pitchers struggled to keep up with this stat.  The best were Carl Hubbell and Dazzy Vance.  Their ratios were at 2.46 and 2.30.

The legacy continues in the Golden Years with Robin Roberts, who led all comers with a 2.66 mark over a career around 4600 innings.

Then came the raised mound era with a larger strike zone.  Pitchers were given a boost, and results followed. Juan Marichal, a great command pitcher, and Sandy Koufax led the way with Marichal a bit over 3.00 and Koufax at 2.93.

In 1969 the mound was lowered and the strike zone was shrunk. But pitchers were still expected to put up great command figures along with strikeouts and complete games.  Among all the HOF pitchers of this era, Ferguson Jenkins (with several years during the raised mound under his belt), and HOF candidate Bert Blyleven lead the way. 

Blyleven’s mark of 2.80 is one of the highest since the live ball era began, and he did it over 4970 innings!  Bert Blyleven is one of the great command pitchers in baseball history!

Most people familiar with Blyleven’s case for the HOF know that he stands fifth all-time in strikeouts.  That was the first stat that struck me as important.  We set up a hit milestone of 3000 for automatic induction to the HOF. Walter Johnson broke the 3000 K barrier in the 1920s. Nobody came close to it again until Bob Gibson broke the barrier in the early 70s.

Since that time we have had two generations to see what kind of a milestone it is in modern baseball.  The pitchers who have passed the total have all been HOF worthy – Gaylord Perry, Nolan Ryan, Steve Carlton, Tom Seaver, Phil Neikro, Don Sutton, and more recently, Roger Clemens, Randy Johnson, Greg Maddux, Pedro Martinez, Curt Schilling, and John Smoltz. 

Now add Bert Blyleven to this list and put him not at the end, but fifth all-time with 3701 Ks.  This is a significant accomplishment, very strongly indicating HOF worthiness.

What I feel is Bert Blyleven’s strongest calling card for the HOF are his 60 career shutouts.  Since 1921, the advent of the live ball era, and the end of the low scoring dead ball era, when shutouts were prevalent — (Walter Johnson 110, Pete Alexander 90, Christy Mathewson 78, Eddie Plank 69), there have been four pitchers who have totalled 60 career shutouts.  They are Warren Spahn (63), Nolan Ryan (61), Tom Seaver (61), and Bert Blyleven (60).

Career shutouts are one of the most accurate gauges of pitching greatness we have.  They are at least as accurate in the modern era of baseball — 1901-1992 as Wins or ERA+ to measure pitching greatness and domination.

Take a look at the career shutout list and you see the greatest pitchers in the game!  Bert Blyleven is ninth on this list.

Blyleven has 15 shutouts when he won the games 1-0.  That is more than any other pitcher since the advent of the live ball era!

There is one more very strong indicator for HOF greatness — career WAR, or wins over replacement.  This is a system that puts a value to each year a pitcher performed and gives it a score for the value of the season compared to the level of a replacement pitcher. 

(The era Blyleven pitched — 1970-1992 was one of the greatest in history for pitching — thus a very high level for the replacement pitcher, and a premium placed on the score a pitcher was able to get during this time.)

Bert Blyleven’s career total WAR of 90.1 puts a value on his career.  He was 90.1 wins better than a replacement pitcher for his career.  There are pitchers with a higher score from his era, like Tom Seaver – 104-105.  But 90.1 places Blyleven 10th in the modern era since 1901!

His total is higher than Nolan Ryan, Steve Carlton, and Jim Palmer.  No pitcher in history has scored higher than 66 points and not made the HOF. Any cut off line for the HOF is passed easily by his 90.1 career WAR.  Whitey Ford (55), Tom Glavine (67), Bob Lemon (43) and Jack Morris (39.3). 

Here is one more strong and accurate measurement of career value that shows that Bert Blyleven belongs in the HOF. 

I think adding all this together you come up with an accurate picture of how Bert Blyleven fits in with the history of pitching in baseball, and fits in with the HOF.

There are more indications of strong performance, like his postseason record of 5-1 and a 2.47 ERA.  He has two World Series rings for his work with the ’79 Pirates and the ’87 Twins.  These were not his best years, but his record shows an ability to raise his game when he faced the best competition on the biggest stage.

I think high on this list also should be the impact of the curve ball he threw.  It was considered the best of his era, perhaps the best in baseball history, and has been used as a measuring stick for grading out curves from all comers since Blyleven.  This gives his career extra significance.

Was Bert Blyleven the best of his era — no, Tom Seaver was.  But he was one of the best in an era that had a great many great pitchers, more than any since the dead ball era.  A quick look comparing Seaver and Blyleven shows how close they truly were in important career categories:

Seaver – 312 neutral wins; Blyleven – 313

Seaver – 234 complete games; Blyleven 242

Seaver – 61 shutouts; Blyleven – 60

Seaver 3640 career Ks (6th); Blyleven 3701 (5th)

Seaver K/BB ratio – 2.65; Blyleven  – 2.80

Seaver was inducted into baseball’s HOF on the first ballot with the highest % to date. 

Waiting all these years to elect Bert Blyleven to the HOF has given us the opportunity in the baseball world to truly study what makes a great pitcher, and appreciate Blyleven’s place in the HOF!

 

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Does Manny Ramirez Belong in the Hall of Fame?

One of the all-time great sports debates has always been as to who deserves to be in the Hall of Fame and who doesn’t.

The sport that this debate is most interesting in, is baseball.  Baseball is different from the rest as there are so many more things to consider when people vote for the HOF.  One of the biggest problems that has come to fruition in recent years has been the use of steroids in professional baseball. 

Nobody seems to be quite sure whether players who have taken steroids or other performance enhancing drugs should be allowed to be a member of baseballs most prestigious group.

Manny Ramirez has been one of the players who has entered the Hall of Fame debate as he quite obviously nears retirement.  It was discovered in the “Mitchell Report” that Manny used steroids which added even more fuel to the fire.  Some debated whether his attitude and antics should affect his chances of making the Hall of Fame.

The majority claimed that Manny’s numbers more than made up for his bad personality. When the steroid issue came along the argument became a 50/50 one that had baseball split on whether they thought Manny deserved a spot in Cooperstown.

The remainder of this article will discuss the different factors that may or may not get Manny into the Hall of Fame.

Manny Ramirez is without a doubt one of the most powerful and most productive hitters to ever play the game of baseball.  Manny has had absolutely monstrous seasons and has received many awards and honors for his accomplishments at the plate.  Manny is a career .313 which ranks him 74th all time, which some of you make think is really far from number one, and your right. 

But, when you consider that Manny is a power hitter and not exactly a speedster, I would say 74th all-time is pretty darn good.  Manny has 555 career home runs which makes him one of only 25 players in major league history with 500-plus.  Ramirez also ranks 13th all time in home runs on the all-time list.  Ramirez has driven in 1830 runs in his career as well which ranks him 17th all-time.

Manny has also won several awards and honors throughout his very decorated career. Man-Ram won the American League batting crown in 2002 (.349 AVG) and has led the league in home runs (2004) and in RBI (1999).   Manny is a 12-time All-Star and has won the prestigious Hank Aaron award twice.

Manny is also a two-time World Series champion and in 2004 was the World Series MVP. Manny Ramirez has also won a silver slugger nine times and has lead the respective leagues in several different categories for extended periods of time throughout his career.

Manny’s reputation has not always been the best.  Manny hasn’t always had his head in the game, sometimes he would just seem disinterested and other times he just doesn’t seem to care or want to do anything for that matter. 

Most fans either love(d) him or hate(d) him.  There didn’t truly seem to be an in between.  Manny was lazy and just plain odd.  He left almost all the teams he played for on terrible terms and hurt a ton of fans.  Every organization he has been with has wanted Manny gone at some point.

The other factor for Manny is the steroid allegations and the controversy that surrounded it.  Ramirez was one of the big names mentioned in the Mitchell Report that caught the eye of baseball fans everywhere.  Manny did his apologizing and served his 50-game suspension. 

Of course, Manny never really admitted to taking performance enhancing drugs.  He instead made the claim that he was using medication to address his erectile dis function.  Is it the truth?  Probably not.  But hey, maybe that was the case but we will never know.

In my opinion, I truly believe Manny Ramirez belongs in the Hall of Fame.  At the end of the day, this isn’t a “Hall of Good Behavior.”  The Hall is for players who have spectacular career stats and have dominated baseball.

Even though Manny has well, been Manny that doesn’t mean he needs to be shunned from the HOF.  It means that Ramirez needs to take some classes on public appearance and behavior but I digress.  Even with the steroids scandal surrounding him, like Barry Bonds and like Alex Rodriguez, you cannot possibly ignore the numbers they put up (not comparing Manny to them).

Manny deserves some credit.

Manny deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. 

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


MLB Hall of Fame: Filling Out the 2011 Ballot

With the 2011 Hall of Fame class set to be announced on January 5, the Twitter universe has been full of debate as to who belongs and who doesn’t. To be honest, I think who belongs in the Baseball Hall of Fame is the most debated topic in sports. People could go on for hours talking who should be in and who should be out and why.

Since I don’t have an official Hall of Fame vote and since this is such a heated topic, I thought I would fill out my ballot. Here is my Hall of Fame class of 2011.

Bert Blyleven
Year on Ballot:
14th
Percentage Vote:
74.2 percent

The Blyleven debate is perhaps THE most heated HOF debate ever. The whole thing has pretty much taken on a life of its own. And quite frankly, the whole thing is ridiculous.

Blyleven should have been a Hall of Famer 10 years ago. I still can’t believe this guy isn’t in Cooperstown.

How can people vote for a guy like Don Sutton and not Blyleven? Why? Because he didn’t get 13 more wins to get to the magical number of 300? Absurd.

Blyleven will finally get in this year and we can finally end this debate once and for all.


Roberto Alomar
Year on Ballot:
2nd
Percentage Vote:
73.7 percent

The best overall second baseman in my generation (1984 to present), I couldn’t believe that Alomar didn’t get in on the first try last year. I know a lot of people are sour on Alomar because of how he just completely fell off toward the end of his career with the New York Mets, but in his prime, there was none better.

Alomar had the ability to beat a team with his bat, glove, and speed. With 2,724 hits, 474 SB, and a defensive resume that speaks for itself, Alomar gets my vote in 2011.


Tim Raines

Year on Ballot:
4th
Percentage Vote: 
30.4 percent

For years, Raines was the National League version of Ricky Henderson. From 1981 to 1995, Raines averaged a .296/.386/.429 slash line with 10 HR, seven triples, 25 doubles, and 51 SB. He would have been a $15 to $20 million player in today’s game.

What I believe hurts Raines in the voting is that toward the end of his career he bounced around an awful lot (played on five teams from 1998 through 2002) and he had a lot of off-field issues. However, here is my logic for voting for Raines.

If Jim Rice is going to get in based on dominating the American League for 10 years, then Raines should get in for dominating the National League for seven. I don’t think three years should make much of a difference.


Edgar Martinez

Year on Ballot:
2nd
Percentage Vote:
36.2 percent

For me, Martinez is the best pure, right-handed hitter that I have ever seen. His swing was as smooth as it gets and his stats are even smoother. All I need to tell you about Martinez is that he had a .933 career OPS. Just amazing.

The negative on Martinez is that he was a DH. Well, my take on that is, if he is the greatest DH to ever play, then how is that a negative?

Whether you like or not, the DH is a position in baseball. And if a guy—in this case Martinez—is the best EVER at it, then he should be in the Hall of Fame.

Those are who got my vote for this year’s Baseball HOF class. Who would you vote for? Did guys like Jack Morris, Larry Walker, Mark McGwire, Jeff Bagwell or Alan Trammell get your vote?

Let me know.


You can follow The Ghost of Moonlight Graham on Twitter @ theghostofmlg

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Rafael Palmeiro: Deny Him the Hall of Fame To Protect the Game

On paper, Rafael Palmeiro is a sure-fire Hall of Famer. Unfortunately, in the real world he is not. He is the poster boy for the steroid era, and he in turn sullied the game the same way others like Rose and the Black Sox did.

Despite vehemently denying the use of steroids, he failed a steroid test, was named by Jose Canseco as a user and he was also named in the Mitchell Report. The amount of evidence against him is staggering, and because of that evidence, Palmeiro must be kept out of the Hall of Fame.

So far, the Hall has been able to keep itself uncorrupted from all the problems and illegalities that have plagued the game over the last hundred years. Letting Palmeiro into the Hall of Fame sets a precedent, allowing all other steroid users in, and justifying baseball’s gilded age. For the sake of the purity of the game, we must keep Palmeiro and all other steroid users out of the Hall of Fame.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


My 2011 Baseball Hall Of Fame Ballot (If I Had One)

As we rapidly approach January, members the Baseball Writers Association of America (BBWAA) are filling out their ballots for the 2011 inductees to the Baseball Hall of Fame.  With the Winter Meetings over, January’s HOF announcement is the biggest story until pitchers and catchers report in about six weeks.

For those of you who don’t know how the balloting works, here is a brief summary.  All candidates that received greater than five-percent of votes in the previous year remain on the ballot.  Players that have spent 15 years on the ballot without getting elected are dropped. 

The holdovers from the previous season are joined new candidates selected form a pool of players that have been retired for five years (or deceased for six months) and played a minimum of 10 MLB seasons.

Voters can choose to put up to 10 players on their ballot.  Any players appearing on over 75-percent of submitted ballots are inducted the following summer.  With that in mind, here is my ballot.

Begin Slideshow


2011 MLB Hall of Fame Inductions: Mark McGwire Does Not Belong

Mark McGwire was one of the most powerful, exciting hitters to ever step up to the plate. He was a focal point of an era that provided sports fans all over the world with the kind of entertainment that comes around just once in a lifetime.

McGwire’s eye-popping stats and incredible home run race with Sammy Sosa in 1998 transformed him from an MLB superstar into an international icon. Every man, woman, and child owned a McGwire jersey, the St. Louis Arch was renamed the St. McGwire Arch, and fast food franchises created meals in his honor.

Unfortunately for Marky Mark and the game of baseball, McGwire is also one of the most infamous cheaters in the history of sports.

In January of 2010, a teary-eyed McGwire sat across from Bob Costas and came clean about his steroid usage, admitting that steroids had been flowing through his veins for an entire decade, including his record-breaking season in 1998.

Even though his dirty little secret is out, McGwire still will not admit that steroids helped him get the ball over the fence. He claims that no pill or syringe can give a player the extraordinary hand-eye coordination that he displayed throughout his career and he took steroids solely for health purposes.

This may seem like the usual pathological liar banter, but McGwire actually has a point. The steroids that the first baseman injected himself with had absolutely no effect on his god-given hand-eye coordination, but the baseball statistic that is directly proportional with hand-eye coordination is batting average, and McGwire had a career batting average of .263.

What did the steroids provide McGwire? Muscle mass.

The University of Illinois conducted a study titled “The Possible Effect of Steroids on Home Run Production“, and Professor Alan M. Nathan very clearly concludes, “a modest increase in muscle mass can lead to a very large increase in HRBiP.”

I’m no rocket scientist, but that sounds like steroids helped McGwire and many others hit the ball harder and farther. Therefore, any players that are proven steroid users are proven cheaters.

What exactly is the Major League Baseball Hall of Fame and who belongs in it?

According to the Hall’s official website, “The National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum is an independent, non-profit educational institution dedicated to honoring those who have made outstanding contributions to our national pastime.”

So, according to the official definition, the question that the Hall of Fame voters must ask themselves is, “Has Mark McGwire made an outstanding contribution to our national pastime?”

Unless I’m mistaken, McGwire has done the exact opposite.

With a little help from his friends, McGwire temporarily ruined the game of baseball.

When all of the sport’s superstars became super-scumbags, there was really no reason to watch baseball anymore and the record-shattering McGwire is more to blame for that than most of the other accused cheaters.

Cooperstown is a place meant for former players, coaches, and broadcasters that improved the game of baseball with their extraordinary efforts on and off the diamond, and the induction of a player that did nothing but hurt our national pastime should not even be considered.

Life would be a little bit easier if the MLB just created a “Major League Baseball Hall of Fame: Steroid Edition.” 

I’m sure Mark would be a first-ballot candidate.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


MLB: 10 Yankees That Fans Should Never Forget

If there’s one team that has history, it’s the New York Yankees. For over 100 years, a myriad of players have passed through New York, many of which have ended up in the Hall of Fame. However, while fans give all of their attention to the Jeters, Mantles, and DiMaggios, many forget the effective players who put up great numbers, but stayed out of the spotlight. That being said, I’m giving you readers a list of the 10 most underrated Yankees of the past 20 years!

Begin Slideshow


George Steinbrenner Can Wait To Be a Hall of Famer

I have no problem with sports figures who are the personality equivalent of a stiff drink. Ted Williams is one of my all-time favorites. To me, Bobby Knight is a genius coach. If I shut down the moral center of my brain, I can even appreciate Kobe Bryant and Ty Cobb for their statistics and work ethic.

So it’s not out of character prejudice that I think George Michael Steinbrenner III can wait to get into the Hall of Fame. Mr. “breathing first, winning next” certainly has the credentials to have earned a spot. Consider these facts and stats under his ownership:

– Seven World Series championship teams
– Eleven pennant winners
– Seventeen division titles
– Six no-hitters (and two perfect games)
– Four MVP and three Cy Young winners
– Eight 100-win seasons
– Twenty-two first or second-place finishes from managers Billy Martin, Lou Piniella, Buck Showalter, Joe Torre, Don Zimmer and Joe Girardi

And consider just a few of the Yankees who played during his years: Reggie Jackson, Thurman Munson, Catfish Hunter, Ron Guidry, Goose Gossage, Don Mattingly, Ricky Henderson, Wade Boggs, Andy Pettitte, Mariano Rivera, Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada, Mike Mussina, Roger Clemens and Alex Rodriguez.

Under the glow of that shining record, it seems like a no-brainer that the Veterans Committee should have voted in George just five months after his death.

But, historically, the Veterans Committee hasn’t been what you could call “timely.” The last two executives they voted into the Hall, in 2008, were Bowie Kuhn and Walter O’Malley. Kuhn’s career ended in 1984, O’Malley’s in 1979.

They should consider themselves swiftly blessed. The committee didn’t recognize William Ambrose Hulbert—one of the founders of the National League and president of the Chicago White Stockings—until 1995.

I should mention he died in 1882.

I could give more examples of the committee’s history of giving late appreciations—including references to the Hartford Dark Blues and the Boston Beaneaters—but maybe it’s more important to note that the only executive they voted in the year he retired was Kenesaw Mountain Landis.

The best reason I can think to explain the ice age it usually takes the Veterans to vote someone in is the reverence baseball has for time. Both they and the members of the BBWAA tend to like some dust on their inductees before they consider them fit for a Hall spot.

I respect their patience. I mean, think of all the movies you considered awesome the year they were made, only to realize not even a decade later that, while arguably great by 2003 standards, “The Matrix Reloaded” doesn’t stand the test of time.

Sometimes we need time not only to respect a list of accomplishments from an objective distance but also to let the likes of Pat Gillick through the door before the obvious guys are acknowledged.

And for those of us with a sense of humor about the Yankees, there’s this sweet irony to enjoy: a man notorious for his impatience in all things will have to wait for his place in Cooperstown.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Ryno With Brad Wolff: Baseball Hall of Famer Ryne Sandberg Interview

Ryne Sandberg was a second baseman for the Chicago Cubs and briefly the Philadelphia Phillies. Sandberg now manages a Phillies minor league team, the Lehigh Valley Iron Pigs, and is a member of the National Baseball Hall of Fame 2005 class.

In his 16 years in the major leagues, Sandberg was a 10-time All-Star, nine time Gold Glover, seven time Silver Slugger and was the National League MVP in 1984. Ryno’s .989 career fielding percentage at second base is a record for second basemen. Interestingly, Sandberg is named after three time All-Star Ryne Duren. 

Instead of the interview being written completely, I am experimenting with a YouTube video of the interview. Hopefully, I will do some video interviews soon so you can actually watch the interview.

Please comment below if you enjoy the older format of written interviews, instead of YouTube video interviews.

The interview is located at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDeDRvxlXFo

Enjoy!

Check out my blog posts at www.thekingofsportsblog.com

Follow my tweets and I’ll follow you back www.twitter.com/brad_wolff

Become a FaceBook fan of mine at http://www.facebook.com/tkosb

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


My 2011 Baseball Hall of Fame Ballot

Last Monday, Major League Baseball revealed the names of the 33 players on the 2011 Hall of Fame ballot. The list contains 19 first-year candidates along with 14 holdovers from previous seasons.

In order to be eligible for the Hall of Fame, a player must have spent at least 10 years in the Majors, with his final game coming in the 2005 season.

Holdover candidates must be named on at least five percent of the ballots from the previous season and can remain eligible for 15 years. Any player who is named on 75 percent of the ballots in a given year is inducted into the Hall of Fame.

Here is my 10-player ballot.

Begin Slideshow


Copyright © 1996-2010 Kuzul. All rights reserved.
iDream theme by Templates Next | Powered by WordPress