Tag: NL West

Gabe Kapler Could Be Catalyst in Turning Yasiel Puig Back into an MLB Superstar

The Los Angeles Dodgers have a few priorities to address this winter. The list begins with hiring a new manager. Elsewhere, there’s what to do about star right fielder/everlasting headache Yasiel Puig.

Or, the Dodgers could address both priorities at once. All they have to do is hire Gabe Kapler as their new skipper and let him deal with Puig. It could be as simple as that. For, you know, reasons. 

But we’ll get to those later.

For now, understand it’s hardly a foregone conclusion that the Dodgers are going to hire Kapler to replace the departed Don Mattingly. He’s been mentioned as a heavy favorite for the job, including by Buster Olney of ESPN.com and Ken Rosenthal of Fox Sports, but there are others in the mix.

Bill Plaschke of the Los Angeles Times has reported that former Dodger Dave Roberts is also on the club’s radar and that his stock may be rising. Per Jim Bowden of ESPN and MLB Network Radio, there are also quite a few other candidates in the mix:

But as outlined by Dylan Hernandez of the Los Angeles TimesKapler remains an intriguing choice. His current position as the Dodgers’ farm director gives him plenty of familiarity with the organization. And as a former player who spent a dozen years in the majors and has since embraced analytics, he could be a rare skipper who speaks the language of both the front office and the clubhouse.

There’s also this: Out of all the Dodgers’ managerial candidates, Kapler might be the best equipped to turn Puig into a superstar.

Mind you, it does require some skepticism to presume that Puig needs to be “turned into” a superstar. Even after a trying 2015 season—in which injuries limited him to 79 games and he posted a career-worst .758 OPSPuig‘s career still looks like that of an exceptional player.

In three seasons, Puig has racked up a .294/.371/.487 slash line. That gives him a career .858 OPS, which equates to a 141 OPS+, which places him among the league’s top 15 hitters (min. 1,000 PAs) since 2013. And even after his rough 2015, WAR still rates him as one of the game’s top five right fielders.

So, there. Puig is a really good player. As well he should be, as 6’2″, 255-pound bundles of strength, speed and electricity aren’t mass-produced (yet…).

But if we allow ourselves to be more realistic for at least a second, Puig has indeed earned skepticism about his superstar status.

Rather than he is a superstar, it’s more accurate to say Puig can be a superstar. The difference between “can be” and “is” comes down to consistency, a concept that has thus far eluded Puig.

To illustrate, behold a chart of his month-to-month OPS:

Granted, the various injuries Puig has dealt with haven’t helped. But pinning his inconsistency on the injury bug is unfair to the injury bug. Just as much as his injuries, Puig‘s inconsistency is owed to the fact that he’s just, well, inconsistent.

At the plate, his inconsistency comes from all-too-frequent lapses in pitch recognition and plate discipline. On the bases, his recklessness can just as easily lead to a comedy of errors as it can results. And though his defense features some amazing throws, he also makes it hard to ignore his comes-and-goes effort level and his penchant for overthrowing cutoff men.

Vin Scully, the Dodgers’ legendary play-by-play announcer, calls Puig “the Wild Horse.” In light of how he carries himself off the field, that’s too perfect.

But just as noteworthy, of course, is that Puig‘s nickname also applies to how he carries himself in general.

Puig‘s assorted behavioral issues—with tardiness, with his temper, with his work ethic, etc.—were well-documented in 2013 and 2014. And though many of his transgressions seemed overblown, it became harder to back that perception in 2015.

Jeff Passan of Yahoo Sports noted that Puig‘s behavior actually improved throughout the year, but Molly Knight’s book The Best Team Money Can Buy pulled back the curtain on Puig‘s contentious relationship with Mattingly and with his teammates.

“[Mattingly] had to deal with Yasiel Puig, who’s phenomenally talented, sells tickets…and he’s a basket case,” said Knight in an interview with Grantland’s Jonah Keri. “He flouts all the rules, skips BP, shows up late. What do you do? Bench him and watch your team lose? Or not punish him and piss off 24 other guys?”

In Mattingly‘s defense, he did try to find the right gloves for handling Puig. There were plenty of times in which he stood up for Puig. And as Knight hinted at, it’s also to Mattingly‘s credit that he didn’t let Puig‘s antics get in the way of the Dodgers’ winning three straight NL West titles.

But for all that Mattingly did well, his style of managing Puig can still be second-guessed.

Though there were instances in which Mattingly defended Puig, there were also instances in which he couldn’t hide his frustration with him, and instances in which he effectively used the media to challenge Puig to shape up and become more mature. Mattingly also wasn’t shy about benching Puig, most infamously when the Dodgers were facing elimination in the 2014 postseason.

For Mattingly, Puig was a problem child. His response was generally to treat Puig as such. From three years’ worth of material, we can gather this wasn’t the best approach for handling Puig.

Which brings us, finally, back to Kapler.

If the Dodgers hire him, they could at least count on his approaching The Great Puig Project with enthusiasm. During his rise to prominence as a writer and TV analyst, Kapler made it clear he’s a big fan of Puig‘s style. Writing at Gammons Daily in 2013, Kapler even went so far as to write that Puig was “the most charming, exciting, engaging and flat out fun player that I’ve ever witnessed.”

Knowing this, Kapler likely wouldn’t be overly preoccupied with getting Puig to leave his “Wild Horse” days behind him on the field. If nothing else, that could help Kapler get on Puig‘s good side.

But lest anyone worry about Puig running amok under Kapler‘s watch, that likely wouldn’t be the case. Simply getting on Puig‘s good side would be only half the battle for Kapler. The other half would be solving the consistency question, and he has both the training and the ideas for the task.

Kapler has experience dealing with raw young talents like Puig. He was the manager for the Single-A Greenville Drive back in 2007, where Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe said Kapler drew “rave reviews” for his performance. More recently, Pedro Moura of the Orange County Register highlighted how Kapler has used a data-driven approach to help get Dodgers youngsters on track. 

Of course, this raises the question: Kapler may have the right kind of background for a job that requires getting the most out of Puig, but how exactly would his approach differ from Mattingly‘s?

Fortunately, there’s no need for wild guesses. Kapler pretty much told us what he would do.

In March 2014, Kapler penned a column for Fox Sports in which he argued that Puig‘s demeanor wasn’t an “attack on the organization.” Rather, it merely signified where Puig was in the developmental cycle. To Kapler, Puig looked not like a “man without experience” but a “man without boundaries.”

To establish the necessary boundaries, Kapler argued an authoritarian “Bobby Knight approach” was the wrong idea. Instead, the trick should be to give him role models to take after, which, rather than commanding Puig to follow, has to do with encouraging respected veterans to lead by example.

Or, in short: “The question isn’t ‘How should Mattingly handle Puig?’ It’s ‘How should the Dodgers family handle Puig?'”

Is this the right approach for handling Puig? Only time could tell. But it’s at least an approach the Dodgers seemingly haven’t tried yet. That alone makes it worth trying, and Kapler is certainly the right guy to carry it out.

If it were to turn out that Kapler isn’t the guy to get the most out of Puig, well, that could actually end up being neither here nor there. The Dodgers were able to win in 2015 despite the fact Puig was basically a footnote throughout the year. Between the talent they have now and the resources they have to add more talent, they could move forward into 2016 with a real chance to do that all over again.

If, on the other hand, it were to turn out that Kapler is the right guy to turn Puig into the superstar he can be, the reward could very well be the Dodgers turning into the superteam they so badly want to be.

 

Stats courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com and FanGraphs unless otherwise noted/linked.

If you want to talk baseball, hit me up on Twitter.

Follow zachrymer on Twitter 

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Nori Aoki, Marlon Byrd Options Declined by Giants: Latest Details and Reaction

The MLB offseason is less than a week old, and the San Francisco Giants already made some news.

Andrew Baggarly of the Bay Area News Group noted the 2014 World Series champions declined the options on the contracts of outfielders Marlon Byrd and Nori Aoki. According to Spotrac, Byrd’s option was worth $8 million, while Baggarly said Aoki’s was worth $5.5 million, although he gets a $700,000 buyout.

Baggarly also pointed out Aoki is cleared of concussion symptoms that bothered him this season, but it is “tough” for general manager Robert Evans to commit the money this early in the offseason. The writer offered his take on the situation and the team’s mindset with the decisions:

Byrd played 39 games for the Giants after they acquired him from the Cincinnati Reds for a potential postseason push. He hit .272 with four home runs and 31 RBI and finished with 23 long balls in 2015. It marked the third consecutive season he topped the 20-homer mark.

Even at age 38, Byrd provides power in the middle of the order, although he is an average defender at this stage of his career. According to Fangraphs, he accounted for one total defensive run saved above average this season, and it is logical to assume his range will decrease as he continues to age. 

As for Aoki, he dealt with health concerns throughout the 2015 campaign and only played 93 games. He still stole 14 bases and tallied a .353 on-base percentage, which put him in impressive company, as Matthew Pouliot of Rotoworld.com highlighted:

While Aoki gets on base as a speed threat at the top of the order (he has 81 steals the last four years), his defense is inadequate in the outfield. According to Fangraphs, he posted a minus-one total defensive run saved above average in 2015 and a minus-eight total defensive runs saved above average in 2014 as a member of the Kansas City Royals.

These are two veterans on the wrong side of 30 (Aoki is 33) who bring plenty to the table on offense but not as much on defense. With the entire offseason ahead of them, the Giants elected to keep their options open.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


L.A. Metro Offers Zack Greinke a Free Lifetime of Bus Rides to Stay with Dodgers

According to Bill Shaikin of the Los Angeles TimesLos Angeles Dodgers ace Zack Greinke opted out of his contract Wednesday, becoming a free agent and opening the door for bigger money—and apparently a free bus pass, courtesy of L.A. Metro.

Yep. The public transit company offered the pitcher a lifetime of free public transportation use in Los Angeles County if he re-signs with the Dodgers…plus, you know, whatever financial terms the franchise actually offers him.

Surefire plan, L.A. Metro. Well done.

[LA Metro, h/t SB Nation]

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


San Francisco Giants Order 25 Pizzas for Kansas City Royals

Nothing warms the heart quite like good sportsmanship—or good pizza.

The San Francisco Giants brought the two together on Monday, ordering 25 pizzas from a Kansas City pizzeria for the newly crowned world champions, the Kansas City Royals.

It was even delivered with a personalized note:

Dear Royals,

Have fun planning the parade! Enjoy the ride!

Sincerely,

The San Francisco Giants

[San Francisco Giants, h/t For The Win]

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


How Giants Stealing Zack Greinke from Under Dodgers Would Impact NL West

Zack Greinke‘s original team, the Kansas City Royals, just won a World Series, helped in no small part by his decision to talk his way out of town five years ago.

Next questions: How does Greinke win one for himself? And how do the San Francisco Giants go about keeping their every-other-year thing going, setting themselves up to win in 2016 the way they did in 2010, 2012 and 2014?

Well, stealing Greinke away from the rival Los Angeles Dodgers wouldn’t hurt. It wouldn’t hurt the Giants, and it wouldn’t hurt Greinke.

It would only hurt the Dodgers, but that’s kind of what the Giants are in business to do, isn’t it?

This World Series is over, and free agency is just about to begin. Greinke isn’t even a free agent yet, not until he goes through the formality of opting out of the final three years and $71 million of the six-year, $147 million contract he signed with the Dodgers three winters ago.

He’s going to opt out, not because he hates Dodger blue or Southern California, and certainly not because he doesn’t want $71 million. He’s going to opt out because he’s coming off an historic season and there’s absolutely no doubt he’ll get more years and more dollars from whatever team signs him.

We know the dollars are key, and not just because they always are. Greinke is maybe the most honest player ever, and when he talked to Jon Heyman of CBSSports.com a few months after signing with the Dodgers, he said the money was “obviously the No. 1 thing.”

If the big-bucks Dodgers really want to keep Greinke now, it’s hard to see how the Giants could stop them. Then again, with Greinke having turned 32 in October, there’s a chance Andrew Friedman’s analytics wizards will let the numbers dictate a less-than-top-dollar final offer. They could leave the door open for San Francisco, which Heyman and others have tabbed as a possible Greinke suitor.

It makes perfect sense, for him and for them. The Giants need another top starter to pair with Madison Bumgarner, much the way the Dodgers paired Greinke with Clayton Kershaw. Greinke needs a team with the money to pay him and a roster that says “win now.”

Money may well be “the No. 1 thing” for Greinke, but we also know from his past decisions that winning matters. He pushed for a deal away from the Kansas City Royals five years ago because he was tired of losing and didn’t see things changing, and he basically nixed a trade to the Washington Nationals because he thought with what the Nationals would need to give up to get him, they wouldn’t have enough left to win.

He ended up going to the Milwaukee Brewers in a deal that worked out for everyone, but especially for the Royals. With Greinke, the Brewers came within two wins of going to the World Series for the first time since 1982. With the players they got directly or indirectly in the Greinke deal (Alcides Escobar and Lorenzo Cain directly, Wade Davis and James Shields indirectly), the Royals have been to the World Series two straight years and just won it for the first time since 1985.

You could say Greinke was wrong when he didn’t see a chance to win with the Royals, but you could also say the Royals don’t get there without trading him. In any case, it’s hard to see how they still would have had him now, since they weren’t giving him a $147 million contract.

Regardless, what’s of greater concern now is where Greinke is going to pitch in 2016 and beyond.

The Giants would need to stretch their budget a little to make it work for them, but in this case they should. As one scout who follows the National League West closely said Monday, “There’s only one guy out there who’s a real game-changer for the Giants, and it’s Greinke. Get him, and you’re going to get [to the playoffs].”

Put Greinke with Bumgarner, and you’ve got Greinke/Kershaw but with a better supporting cast in the rotation and a better bullpen. You’ve also destroyed the rival Dodgers’ biggest strength and sent them scrambling into a free-agent market, where David Price is perhaps the only comparable starting pitcher.

You’ve changed the NL West, which is basically about the Giants and the Dodgers until one of the other three teams takes the significant steps necessary to compete.

You may even have changed baseball, because while Greinke proved to be a good postseason pitcher in his three seasons with the Dodgers, Bumgarner has already shown he’s a great one.

The Giants won the World Series three times in five years, without ever having an overwhelming team everyone thought would win. Add Greinke, and maybe they have that team as they try to make it four titles in seven years.

And if he has to beat the Royals in a World Series to do it, so much the better.

 

Danny Knobler covers Major League Baseball as a national columnist for Bleacher Report.

Follow Danny on Twitter and talk baseball. 

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Andy Green to Padres: Latest Contract Details, Comments and Reaction

The San Diego Padres announced have found their next manager, as the team hired Arizona Diamondbacks third base coach Andy Green. 

B/R’s Scott Miller initially reported Green’s hiring, and the team confirmed on Twitter the new manager will be introduced at a press conference Thursday. 

Miller added that former Minnesota Twins manager Ron Gardenhire and current Pittsburgh Pirates third base coach Rick Sofield both had two interviews with the Padres before they decided to go with Green. 

“I am thrilled to be sitting here and couldn’t be more proud to be in a city like San Diego,” Green said, per the Padres.

General Manager A.J. Preller spoke about the hiring in the team’s announcement:

“Andy has the combination of intelligence and feel for the game that we are looking for to lead this team. As a player, he displayed a strong work ethic and even stronger passion, earning everything he achieved. That passion has carried over into his managerial and Major League coaching career. We are excited to welcome him to the Padres family and look forward to the success he will help bring to San Diego.”

Even though Green doesn’t have Major League Baseball managerial experience, Miller did note he’s had recent success as a skipper in the minors:

The Padres were one of the biggest disappointments in baseball last season, finishing 74-88 despite having a banner offseason in which they acquired Justin Upton, Matt Kemp, James Shields, Craig Kimbrel and Wil Myers. 

The offensive firepower did, for the most part, payoff. San Diego finished eighth in MLB with 650 runs scored, the first time it has finished in the top 20 since 2007.

However, one problem moving forward for Green is that Preller has built a roster with Kemp being paid $21.75 million for each of the next four seasons, Melvin Upton owed $33.1 million for the next two seasons, Shields signed a backloaded contract that pays him $21 million per season through 2018.

Preller seemed to be primed for a lot of moves at the trade deadline in July, but opted to stay put with the roster he built. This isn’t a big market franchise, yet they have six players under contract for 2016, not including players with options or eligible for arbitration making $71.9 million. 

Assuming all seven of the arbitration-eligible players return, that leaves 12 roster spots open for a franchise that had never spent more than $100 million in total payroll since last season. 

If ownership is confident in Preller’s plan, the Padres could go well into nine figures next season hoping that it works in ways that it didn’t this season. Green’s relationship with Preller and what the two of them decide is best for the franchise will be critical for the immediate and long-term direction. 

Bud Black, who had been San Diego’s manager since 2007, was fired in June and replaced by interim Pat Murphy. 

Speaking after the season, when it was announced Murphy wouldn’t get the full-time job, Padres general manager Preller described the qualities he was looking for in his next manager, per the Associated Press (via ESPN.com).

“The biggest thing we’re looking for is somebody that has presence, somebody that has energy, somebody to get our players to play at high level, somebody the players are going to respect and want to play for, somebody the organization can rally around and can establish a culture,” he said. 

Preller, who took over as Padres GM in August 2014, now has the manager he hired in place, and the focus can shift to the offseason. 

The team’s experiment to add marquee, expensive players to compete for a playoff spot didn’t work last year. Green will have a lot of those players back, with Upton the biggest-name free agent, but Preller will have to do more roster tinkering this winter if he wants to help his manager be a success. 

 

Salary and contract info via Cot’s Baseball Contracts

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


How Zack Greinke Opt-Out, Possible Exit Could Shake Up the Dodgers’ Plans

The shake-up in Los Angeles has already started. 

The Dodgers dropped the biggest, though hardly the most surprising, news of the day early Thursday morning when they and manager Don Mattingly mutually decided to separate. That is how the team has termed its parting with its manager, who was under contract through next season.

While this is a relatively significant happening for the Dodgers, it is far from their biggest decision as the offseason approaches for an organization entering its second winter under the direction of the Whiz Kid Dream Team—president Andrew Friedman, general manager Farhan Zaidi and senior VP of baseball operations Josh Byrnes, among others.

Zack Greinke’s pending and probable opt-out is easily the team’s biggest offseason event to this point. He is one of the game’s true aces and helped carry the Dodgers to a third consecutive National League West title in 2015 with arguably the best season of his stellar career.

Greinke has until the third day after the World Series to opt out of his current six-year, $147 million contract, of which he just completed his third season. He has $71 million remaining on the current deal, but he would get a significant raise—possibly more than 100 percent—on the open market. Team sources have told Bleacher Report they fully expect Greinke to become a free agent via that clause, and that belief has been reported by other sources as well.

How Greinke’s negotiations with the Dodgers, and other teams, play out over the next couple of months will have a seismic effect on the free-agent market and the Dodgers’ future.

“We’d love to keep him,” Dodgers first baseman Adrian Gonzalez told reporters, including MLB.com’s Lyle Spencer, after the team’s Game 5 loss to the New York Mets in the NL Division Series. “He’s a big part of this team. He’s been incredible the whole time he’s been here. We love him. We hope he opts to stay.”

Because Greinke has been so incredible in his three seasons with the Dodgers, and because he is coming off a historic season—1.66 ERA, 19-3 record, 225 ERA+, 0.844 WHIP—his opt-out could not come at a better time. It is totally reasonable to expect Greinke to command a deal of five or six years, and something in the area of $150 million is not so far-fetched, even with the known risks that accompany signing a pitcher entering his age-32 season.

Greinke openly spoke about the Dodgers offering him the most money as the reason why he ended up with them prior to the 2013 season, so there is little reason to think he would not make his next decision based on money. If that is the case, it is hard to see any organization being able or willing to outbid the Dodgers, who know better than anyone what Greinke’s production, even as it starts to decline, means to a rotation. Then again, the Dodgers’ analytical front office knows the inherent drawbacks of being saddled with an aging and/or declining player who is owed gobs of dough.

If Greinke were willing to sign a shorter deal, say for four years, for less overall money, say $110 million for an average annual value of $27.5 million, the Dodgers might be fine with sliding that contract across the table—the AAV of that deal would be more than a six-year, $150 million one ($25 million). Also, Greinke, not known to hold his tongue or lie, thinks quite highly of his current organization.

“It’s got to be the best franchise in the game, I would think,” Greinke told reporters the night the team’s season ended. “They’re in a great situation.”

But what if Greinke wants something new? What if the Dodgers decide Greinke’s age and market value aren’t worth their nine figures? Then what?

Well, the Dodgers have plenty of other options.

This offseason’s free-agent market is loaded with starting pitching, most notably David Price. The problem with Price is that he could command around $200 million despite his shaky postseason performances, and the Dodgers already have an ace with a contract exceeding that mark in Clayton Kershaw. If the Dodgers were willing to go that route with Price, they might as well re-up with Greinke—signing both is highly unlikely, though not totally out of the question for a team that annually draws more than 3 million fans and has one of the largest television rights deals in the game.

If not Price or Greinke, then the Dodgers could pick from the likes of Johnny Cueto or Jordan Zimmermann. And if they want to sign another, Scott Kazmir, Jeff Samrardzija, Mike Leake and Yovani Gallardo are possibilities.

What is known for sure is that the Dodgers cannot and will not sit idle. They already parted with Mattingly, and parting with Greinke without replacing his production would be a step in the wrong direction, even with the underrated Hyun-jin Ryu and Brandon McCarthy expected back in the rotation at some point next season and Alex Wood expected to occupy a spot.

The Dodgers will not win with Kershaw and a cast of backup singers. They need another co-ace to pair with him. Who that might be all depends on how the market looks in about a month, and by being one of the heavy hitters, the Dodgers are likely to help shape it by attacking either Greinke or Price, or both or neither.

Because of their money, current standing and future outlook, the decision is theirs. And it will be their most critical of this offseason.

 

All quotes, unless otherwise specified, have been acquired firsthand by Anthony Witrado. Follow Anthony on Twitter @awitrado and talk baseball here.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Don Mattingly, Dodgers Part Ways: Takeaways from Former Manager’s Presser

The five-year marriage between Don Mattingly and the Los Angeles Dodgers came to an end Thursday as the two sides announced they had mutually agreed to part ways, per Ken Gurnick of MLB.com.

It was a disappointing finish to Mattingly’s tenure as manager of the team. The Dodgers finished over .500 in each of his five seasons at the helm, making the postseason in each of the last three years, but their last two playoff appearances ended in the National League Division Series.

To put a final bow on this era of Dodgers baseball, Mattingly and members of the Los Angeles front office met with the media to discuss Thursday’s decision and what it means for both the former skipper and the franchise in the future.

Starting off, Dodgers president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman emphasized that the parting of ways was mutual, per Bill Plunkett of the Orange County Register:

Mattingly would expand on why he agreed to the decision, per Bill Shaikin of the Los Angeles Times:

The use of the phrase “part ways” will always lead to skepticism, though it isn’t always wrong. Los Angeles hired Mattingly when Ned Colletti was the general manager. When Friedman came on board in October 2014, he brought in Farhan Zaidi as general manager and Josh Byrnes as senior vice president of baseball operations.

Every regime will have a different philosophy. Mattingly worked with this group for a year and had some success before the two sides went different ways. 

Per Shaikin, Mattingly did say that he felt wanted by the Dodgers and added that he “loved” the various analytics that were presented to him by the new-look front office before adding that this is best for both sides:

Per Plunkett, Mattingly offered high praise to the trio of Friedman, Zaidi and Byrnes and where the franchise is going:

Friedman did note, per Plunkett, that today’s decision “wasn’t tied to the outcome of the NLDS” against the New York Mets

Looking to the future, Mattingly and the Dodgers have a lot of big decisions to make. He doesn’t sound like someone who wants to be out of the dugout for long, per Shaikin:

The Dodgers will become the most attractive managerial opening in the offseason. No team can match their combination of financial resources, front-office credentials and willingness to adapt.

It also doesn’t hurt to have Clayton Kershaw leading the rotation, though Zack Greinke’s opt-out clause will create some panic behind the left-hander if the Dodgers can’t reach a deal with their right-handed ace.

Friedman said during the presser, per Plunkett, that the Dodgers “expect to have a new manager in place” before the winter meetings begin December 7. 

Also of note, from Plunkett, Zaidi anticipates that the Dodgers will “have a younger team going forward.” Age is key for this franchise, as it started 2015 with the eighth-oldest roster in baseball. A lot of the team’s older players—in this case, anyone over 30—are eating up a lot of money. 

Adrian Gonzalez, Carl Crawford, Howie Kendrick, Jimmy Rollins, Andre Ethier and Brandon McCarthy combined to make roughly $94.7 million last season. Using FanGraphs’ wins above replacement, those six combined for a WAR of 8.3; Kershaw’s WAR in 2015 was 8.6. 

There were many problems for the Dodgers this season, beyond Mattingly’s tactics or understanding of the analytics at his disposal. 

Sometimes, being able to get a clean break can work out best for everyone. Mattingly will now have an opportunity to interview for other managerial openings if he wants. The Dodgers can conduct a thorough search to get the right manager for what the franchise needs moving forward.

Thursday’s press conference between the Dodgers and Mattingly gave them an opportunity to clear the air before taking the next steps in their baseball journeys. 

 

Contract info via Cot’s Baseball Contracts.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Dodgers Manager Search: Latest News, Rumors After Don Mattingly’s Departure

The Los Angeles Dodgers and manager Don Mattingly mutually agreed to part ways Thursday, according to the club’s official Twitter account. Now, the search for a new manager is underway.  

Continue for updates.


Gabe Kapler Being Considered For Position

Friday, Oct. 23

Ken Rosenthal of Fox Sports reported “numerous people” in the industry would be shocked if Gabe Kapler was not named Dodgers manager in the next 24 hours. Rosenthal noted Kepler’s relationship with team president Andrew Friedman would be “paramount” in the search. 

Both Buster Olney of ESPN.com and Joel Sherman of the New York Post reported the Dodgers were beginning the process of hiring a new manager, with Gabe Kapler as one of the team’s candidates. Olney described Kapler as a “serious frontrunner” for the gig.

Kapler, 40, is the Dodgers minor league director and, as Bill Shaikin of the Los Angeles Times noted, has more managerial experience than Mattingly did when he took the job. He spent one season as a Class A manager and is also a former player who spent 12 seasons in the major leagues.

Kapler certainly won’t be the only candidate, however. Shaikin speculated Chicago Cubs bench coach Dave Martinez, former San Diego Padres manager Bud Black, Dodgers bench coach Tim Wallach and Dodgers third base coach Ron Roenicke would also be considered for the gig.

The job will certainly be a premier one for potential managers. The Dodgers have a talented cast of players already in place, led by starting pitcher Clayton Kershaw. While the gig does present its challenges—dealing with the pressure of having one of baseball’s biggest payrolls and the expectations that follow, or getting the best out of outfielder Yasiel Puig—no current managerial openings come with a roster loaded with so much talent.

 

Follow TRappaRT on Twitter

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Don Mattingly’s Inevitable Exit Gives Him, Dodgers Chance for New Beginning

Sometimes it’s just best to move on.

Best for the Los Angeles Dodgers. Best for Don Mattingly, too.

It’s time for them to find a manager their front office of analytical all-stars can truly embrace. It’s time for him to find a team that truly appreciates what he can do.

Mattingly was sometimes criticized for his in-game strategy, but managers are mostly managers of people, and he has shown an ability to do that well.

It’s time to move on, which is exactly what the Dodgers and Mattingly did Thursday. He and the organization agreed to part ways, a mutual decision first reported by Jon Heyman of CBSSports.com and later confirmed by sources.

Mattingly isn’t a failed manager. Far from it. In five seasons with the Dodgers, he proved adept at the most important part of the job, dealing with often-difficult personalities. He also won more regular-season games than San Francisco Giants manager Bruce Bochy (446-428).

No, he didn’t win a championship (while Bochy won his second and third with the Giants). You can argue whether that was because of his mistakes or because of the ultimately flawed roster he was handed—I’m going with the flawed roster—but it’s absolutely true that he never won it all.

Maybe he will at the next stop, just as his mentor, Joe Torre, finally won big when he landed with the New York Yankees.

Mattingly will end up somewhere, possibly soon. According to sources, he’s interested in the Washington Nationals, but is more likely to end up with the Miami Marlins, who have been clear about their interest in him.

The Marlins and owner Jeffrey Loria are hardly a model of stability, but Loria badly wants Mattingly, and may even offer him some input in decision-making.

That’s as opposed to what happened this season with the Dodgers, where it wasn’t even clear how much input Mattingly had in his own lineup. When he answered every lineup question with some version of “We thought it gave us the best chance of winning,” there was always a suspicion that “we” didn’t always include the manager.

The Dodgers can say what they want about how much they loved Mattingly. He’s a nice guy. Most people who meet him come away loving him.

He’s a nice guy, but he was never their nice guy. Mattingly was hired by former general manager Ned Colletti, who always believed in him. Andrew Friedman and his numbers guys simply inherited him.

Truth be told, the parting of ways probably should have happened last winter, when Friedman could have pursued Joe Maddon, who worked so well with him with the Tampa Bay Rays. Instead, the Dodgers kept Mattingly, who was said to have had a close relationship with owner Mark Walter.

The decision to keep him didn’t stop the talk that Mattingly was a short-timer in L.A. In Southern California and elsewhere, the belief was Mattingly would be a goner unless the Dodgers advanced deep into the postseason, that maybe he needed a World Series appearance to save his job.

Instead, the Dodgers had another first-round exit, losing in five games to the New York Mets. And while there was talk Mattingly could still survive—ESPN.com‘s Ramona Shelburne said the Dodgers offered him some sort of extension, although Bill Shaikin of the Los Angeles Times said on Twitter an extension was discussed in principle but never offered—eventually both sides agreed on a divorce.

The Dodgers will look for a new manager, with Bob Nightengale of USA Today floating Gabe Kapler as a strong candidate on Twitter. Kapler would be a nice fit, both because of his tight relationship with Friedman and his real interest in analytics.

Mattingly will look for a new job. Miami and Washington look like the best fits, but the San Diego Padres and Seattle Mariners are also still looking for a manager. The Marlins and Nationals would be more likely to let Mattingly be himself, as both could benefit from a manager who’s able to get more out of their talent.

Mattingly will leave behind a legacy as the first Dodgers manager ever to finish in first place in the NL West three straight years, but also as the seventh consecutive Dodgers manager to leave without ending a World Series drought that now stands at 27 years and counting.

The lack of October success was too much for many Dodgers fans to accept, and ultimately too much for Mattingly to overcome with an organization whose leadership had changed drastically since he was hired to take over for Torre after the 2010 season.

He had a nice run.

This is the right time for it to end.

 

Danny Knobler covers Major League Baseball as a national columnist for Bleacher Report.

Follow Danny on Twitter and talk baseball. 

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Copyright © 1996-2010 Kuzul. All rights reserved.
iDream theme by Templates Next | Powered by WordPress