Tag: Tim Lincecum

2010 World Series: Nothing Has Been Won Yet by the San Francisco Giants

The ghosts of opportunities lost can swirl and haunt in an instant, and any temptation for the San Francisco Giants or their fans to look ahead to an assumed World Series title must be stifled.

As Giants fans tingle with the anticipation of a clinching opportunity tonight in Game 5 of the 2010 World Series, the demons of the 2002 World Series are on-deck and ready to swarm.

These ghosts hold permanent residence in the collective memory of all Giants fans.  One need only ask if the name “Scott Spiezio” means anything to a Giants fan, and the resulting expression alone from your victim should aid in clearing up any confusion.

That is, if you don’t get punched first.    

Unfortunately, there is no shelf life attached to the lost moments and horrible memories connected to the recent history of the San Francisco Giants and the World Series.  

I can close my eyes right now and see Dusty Baker handing the ball to Russ Ortiz.  I can remember the 5-run lead in the 7th inning, and the red noisemakers clanged by the Anaheim Angel fans.  I remember being eight outs away, and slapping fives with my buddies.  I remember watching the rally monkey on the screen, and wishing hateful things.  I remember Brendan Donnelly in his goggles striking out seemingly everybody, and then Mr. Spiezo and his bleached hair, hitting a 3-run bomb that changed the entire complexion of the Series.  

Finally, the very next evening, I remember the Angels beating us and becoming the 2002 World Series Champions.    

It was eight years ago, but that collapse is all there for me in vivid, mental color whenever I don’t want it.  It stings, and is as accessible as the memory of being dumped in the Mountain View Tower Records parking lot by my high school girlfriend.  

Yes, the parking lot.       

As for past gut punches, I can’t accurately speak to the sinking emotions surrounding the 1962 World Series for the older generation of Giants fans, because I never had to live through it.  For anyone witnessing Willie McCovey line out to Bobby Richardson that afternoon at Candlestick Park, the finality of it must have been overwhelming.

By all accounts, McCovey crushed the ball, one that a foot to either side of Richardson would have probably scored Willie Mays from second base with the Series-winning run for the Giants.  Instead, that same crowd, who only a half-second before had been rising to their feet anticipating history, were now cut down where they stood.  

Any visions of Market Street parades that day, lost forever to the sight of a New York Yankees celebration on the Candlestick infield. 

It must have been truly awful, but that is as far as I want to take it.  Any further conjecture risks being disrespectful to the fans in attendance, as well as those listening to Lon Simmons on radios all around the Bay Area that day in 1962.  Any more personal musings risk being callous to the pain those fans probably carry in their hearts to this very day, some 48 years later. 

That said, with 2002 as stirring in my own mind, I think I can at least relate.

Like all true sports fans, Giants fans love deeply and without remorse.  We attach the same elevated meaning in our lives to clutch hits as we do tape-measure homeruns that put us ahead.  We lionize twenty-something catchers and pitchers, and lose our minds when a second baseman climbs the ladder to snowcone-grab a liner.  

The haunting phantoms thrive in this passion, and are all too ready to delight in bringing the pain of lost chances and failed glory to the very forefront of our minds for another five decades.  The one thing, the only thing, that can render these demons powerless, is when we believe without assumption, and support without any expectation. 

The Giants have an excellent chance tonight to end over 50 years of futility—a chance.  Should that unbelievably sweet event happen, and the San Francisco Giants actually win the 2010 World Series, the very first since moving West, and the very first title for an amazing city, only then will all suffering Giants fans be able to collectively exorcise the nagging ghosts of our history.    

The vast amount of space that those awful ghosts heretofore occupied in our minds, now replaced with an amazing and permanent memory that can be cherished, recounted and retold until the day we die. 

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


World Series Ratings on Pace for Record Lows

The baseball world got their wish: the New York Yankees are not in the World Series and parity played its part.

The San Francisco Giants with their 11th ranked payroll ($96,277,833), play host to the 25th ranked Texas Rangers ($64,810,570). 

It is great to see new blood in the playoffs; however the ratings do not support that fact.  Game 1 pulled in a rating of 8.9 (approx 15 million viewers).   

Compared to the lowest-rated World Series, Philadelphia Phillies-Tampa Bay Rays, that’s a drop off of 3 percent, and a 25 percent drop from last year’s New York Yankees-Phillies series (also Game 1) 

To make matters worse, the ratings from Game 2 were not any better. 

Game 2 pulled in an 8.5 or nearly 14.5 million viewers—still a 26 percent decrease from last year’s Game 2. 

According to an article published in USA TODAY, Bud Selig still has high hopes for the remaining games:

“MLB commissioner Bud Selig told Sirius XM Radio’s Chris “Mad Dog” Russo Thursday that Giants-Rangers will draw ‘great ratings’ if it can build to a competitive five-game, six-game, or ideally, seven-game series.”

I have to sit on the fence on this one.  On one side, this is great for baseball—new players and more exposure. On the other hand, the Yanks and the Boston Red Sox are nowhere to be found and it does make it feel quite empty this October. 

Sure there are great players: Josh Hamilton, the once untouchable Cliff Lee, “The Freak” Tim Lincecum, Matt Cain, and the ageless Edgar Renteria continuing to perform after 15 seasons. 

There are also great teams: The Texas Rangers, who found themselves in dire straits financially, but stuck it out through 162 games; and the San Francisco Giants, looking for their first World Series title since 1954. 

With all that said, for the viewers to be entertained and the ratings to increase, something magical needs to happen, and happen quickly.   

Games 3 and 4 have to be ones for the ages.  If Game 3 is a blowout with the Giants up 3-0 heading into Sunday night’s game, competing head-to-head against Sunday Night Football, the numbers could be very, very unflattering.

This article can also be found on The GM’s Perspective

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


World Series Game 2: Texas Rangers Need Home Cooking

It’s half-past midnight here in Ranger land and things are looking bleak. Cliff Lee has shown that he is human, and the Ranger bats seem to have gone into hibernation. To add insult to injury, the bullpen is pitching with the ferocity of a petting zoo, and with Halloween right around the corner, it seems as though the Rangers are dressing up as choke artists.

But before you decide to bury the Rangers remember one thing: The Series is coming to Arlington, and there’s nothing like home cooking to “cure what ails ya.”

I know what most of you are thinking, the Rangers have only won two games at home during the playoffs. True. However, there is one enormous difference that most people will overlook—The Rangers get to play by house rules now.

To say that playing at AT&T Park was hard on the Rangers would be like saying that do-it-yourself-dentistry is easy. It was that painful. But now the World Series shifts to Arlington where the Rangers have three games to get back in the race.

What is so substantial about the change of venue? Everything.

Playing by National League rules meant the Rangers had to sacrifice the DH spot in the order; as such, Ranger manager Ron Washington was forced to make a decision: to play Vlad, or not to play Vlad. If you saw Game 1 then you know the answer to that question, and consequently, you know the result: two errors that lead to three back-breaking Giant runs.

Further, because of the lack of a DH, Ranger pitchers were forced into dawning a helmet and wielding the lumber, which meant the Rangers were essentially guaranteed an out in the nine spot. Additionally—and I am not laying blame on the umpires at all—the games were called by National League umpires, and as any big league pitcher would tell you, the transition between the two strike zones is markedly different.

But now, Texas comes home to play in their park, with the luxury of a DH, and a familiar strike zone for their pitchers to work with.

Think about it like this: With the availability of a DH at their disposal, the Rangers can have Vlad’s bat in the middle of the order to protect Nelson Cruz, which also slides down guys like Kinsler and Molina, but perhaps more importantly, the DH puts Mitch Moreland back in the nine spot, a place where he has frustrated pitchers to Dustin Pedroia-like lengths.

The DH also means that the Rangers can use their platoon of David Murphy or Jeff Francoeur, who have both been decent at the plate. So by merit of one position change, the Rangers can have two meaningful bats in the line-up.

But positions and league rules aside, I get the feeling the Rangers were intimidated by the amped up San Francisco crowd. After having played at Tropicana Field, where the Rays had to give away tickets, and then on to Yankee Stadium where the Yankee faithful (I use that term very loosely) left their team for dead routinely, the Rangers didn’t really face much in the way of noise and hostility.

My hats off to Giant fans, you guys brought it.

The look on Derek Holland’s face during his own personal attempt at the March of Dimes in the eight inning of Game 2 said it all—the Rangers were scared. The noise, the energy, the beard, all of it definitely played a part in making Texas look more like the 2003 Rangers than the Claw and Antler edition that fans have come to love.

So where do the Fightin’ Ron Washington’s go from here?

It’s really anyone’s guess at this point. The Giants have pitched so incredibly well that the Rangers definitely have their work cut out for them. One would think that after Lincecum and Cain the sledding would get easier, but Johnathan Sanchez and Madison Bumgardner have proved they can get it done as well.

With Colby Lewis taking the hill, all the eyes of Texas will loom large on the battle tested righty. Can he do what Lee couldn’t? Will the Ranger bats finally come alive with a Frankenstein-like vengeance?

All of the above are unknowns, but if I do know one thing, its that nothing cures an illness quite like home cooking.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


Cliff Lee, World Series 2010: How San Francisco Giants Took Lee in Game 1

Last night’s game was not the total shock many people think. I figured the San Francisco Giants would score a couple runs early against Lee, but was surprised the way they knocked him around.

The Giants pitchers also neutralized Mickey Mantle Jr, I mean, Josh Hamilton.

The Giants game plan with those two players were the key to winning Game 1. 

 

1) Cliff Lee vs. Giants Hitters

The key in getting to Cliff Lee is to be aggressive in the batters box. I have long discussed that on this site. Hitters cannot continue to take early strikes, get behind in the count and then have to react to any on of four different pitches he throws with two strikes.

Lee starts most hitters off with a fastball. He then mixes in cutters, curves and an occasional change up. He is also more likely to throw his curve ball with two strikes.  

And why not? It is harder to control that either the fastball or cutter and you do not have to throw it over the plate with two strikes, just get in low in the zone and you can be successful.

But the Giants are a very aggressive group of free swingers. They like to hack at lots of pitches early in the count, both in and out of the strike zone.

Against Lee, the Giants were aggressive, but mostly on pitches inside the strike zone, more specifically right over the middle of the plate.

They did not chase the high fastball. One of Lee’s important pitching traits is that he moves the ball around, changing the eye level of the hitters.

He works low and away, then up and in. He will throw the two-seamer or curve low, then throw a normal 91 MPH fastball up, many times out of the zone.  

But unlike the Yankees hitters, the Giants lineup did not chase the pitch up and out of the zone. The right-handed hitters also did not offer at the many pitches Lee threw just off the outside corner. That is why Lee probably threw very few changeups.

This forced Lee to work from behind in the count, and then have to come over the plate with his pedestrian fastball.

And that usually gets hit…and hit hard. While there were many hard hit balls, especially in that fifth inning, there were even more fat pitches which the Giants aggressively attacked yet fouled back.

Andres Torres, Juan Uribe and Cody Ross all missed fat fastballs over the middle. Lee threw too many pitches over the middle of the plate. The Giants hitters were also looking to hit the ball the other way, with right handed hitters hitting the ball to the right side.

That allows the ball to travel deeper and the hitter can see the ball longer. Going to right field hurts Lee’s pitching game plan. He thrives on teams like the Yankees who are looking to pull the ball, but the pesky Giants hurt him. Another reason why Lee likely threw very few changeups.

The Giants aggressive nature works well with pitchers who throw lots of strikes. That is why the Giants have beaten Roy Halladay, Cole Hamels and now Cliff Lee in this postseason.

Watch for the Giants to continue to be aggressive on pitches in the zone, and their key to winning is to stay off the pitches out of the strike zone. Even Uribe took two pitches before hammering his three-run home run.

Credit the Giant shitting coach, Hensley Muelens, for putting together a good game plan for the hitters last night and will likely have another good one for tonight.

Tonight’s starter, C.J. Wilson, has one of the highest walk rates in the American League. The Giants will continue to be selectively aggressive.

 

2) Josh Hamilton vs. Giants pitchers

Right now Josh Hamilton has a long swing. He doesn’t have very quick hands and mostly swings with his arms. Does it have something to do with his rib injury from a month ago?

Since most teams pitch him away (like the Yankees always did in the ALCS), Hamilton continuously looks (and leans) out over the plate.

But the Giants pitches have worked Hamilton differently. They have thrown lots of off speed pitches away, but they also challenged Hamilton. 

And they challenged him inside where his long swing can not catch up even with a normal major league fastball.

In Hamilton’s first at bat, Tim Lincecum had to pitch to him with men on first and second.

But Lincecum got Hamilton to meekly ground out on pitches away.

Next time up, Lincecum jammed Hamilton on an 89 MPH fastball up and in.

Third time up, Hamilton was worked outside again and weakly grounded out back to Lincecum.

Fourth time up, Casilla blew an up and in fastball right by Hamilton then got him to fly out again on a fastball in.

The Giants pitchers got Hamilton out twice away and twice in, moving the ball around and not just trying to keep the ball away all the time.

Like the Yankees did, Joe Girardi worked scared against Hamilton. Most of the hard hit balls Hamilton had were on pitches out over the plate when the pitchers were constantly working away.

Look for Matt Cain tonight to continue to pound Hamilton inside with fastballs, but also showing him some stuff away for effect.

The Giants neutralized both of Texas’ main weapons, Lee and Hamilton, and won big in Game 1. If they continue to play smart baseball and do the same things they did in Game 1, they will have an good time in Game 2.

Except for his high walk rate, C.J. Wilson is a similar type pitcher as Lee and can be approached the same way. Wait him out to come over the plate.

And the job of Cain and the able bodied bullpen is to bust Hamilton inside.

He can’t handle that pitch, and the Giants will continue to exploit it.

 

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


World Series 2010: Texas Rangers Look to Rebound from Game 1 Loss

Cliff Lee was thought to be invincible, and his postseason record proved that he just might be. He had never lost in the postseason, that is until Game 1 of the World Series.

Game 1 was a disaster for the Rangers. They allowed 14 hits and 11 runs, with Cliff Lee allowing a postseason-high of six. They made four errors, which was uncharacteristic for a normally solid Rangers team. Cliff Lee was pounded around for 4 2/3 innings.

When the dust settled in the fifth inning, the Rangers were down 5-2, and Cliff Lee was taken out of the game. By the time the inning was over, the Rangers were down 8-2, and Game 1 might as well have been over.

So much for the unbeatable Cliff Lee, so much for the Clee Facts, so much for the “I heart Clee shirts, the absurdity that was “Cliff Lee’s wife doesn’t flirt with him because no one hits on Cliff Lee” turned into anyone and everyone can hit on Cliff Lee.

Lee was unable to locate his breaking pitches and was forced to abandon those altogether. He was forced into being a strictly fastball/cutter pitcher, and that was not working either. Countless times his cutter drifted over the middle of the plate, allowing the Giants to tee-off on Lee.

If you would have told me before the game that Cliff Lee would have more hits than Josh Hamilton, I would have laughed at you, even though Cliff Lee was put up on this high pedestal. Hamilton could not produce a hit, while Lee produced a double in the second inning.

Freddy Sanchez had three doubles in his first three at bats off of Cliff Lee, and everyone was pounding the ball.

The matchup of aces Cliff Lee and Tim Lincecum quickly turned into an afterthought, as both made early exits. The Rangers, rookies in the World Series, played just like you would expect any rookie. They were jittery and nervous, and it showed in their play. Even the great Cliff Lee showed his nervousness throughout the game.

“I think it’s just baseball. That’s the only thing you can say,” Sanchez said. “This is a crazy game.”

“I was trying to make adjustments,” Lee said. “I was up. I was down. I was in. I was out. I was trying to find it, and I was never really consistent with what I was doing.”

This has been the “year of the pitcher”, but if Game 1 was any indication, it will be the World Series of the hitter.

The Giants won 11-7 in a game that was never really that close.

What does this mean for the Rangers?

The Rangers desperately need a win tonight, and they will give the ball to left-hander, C.J. Wilson. Wilson has been the Rangers most consistent pitcher this year, and has snapped Texas’ losing streaks time and time again this season. The Rangers will need him to do just that tonight.

He will be facing Matt Cain tonight, who could be difficult for the Rangers to rebound against.  Cain has allowed one run, nine hits and struck out 11 over 13 2/3 innings while going 1-0 in two starts this postseason. These are impressive stats, and the Rangers will need to produce runs if they want to go back to Texas with the series tied.

A 2-0 deficit is not insurmountable, but it will put the Rangers in a hole that I am not sure they could dig out of.

The Rangers look to rebound tonight against the Giants, and they will need a solid effort from C.J. Wilson to do so.

B/R Prediction: Texas Rangers 5, San Francisco Giants 4

 

For questions regarding the article, please comment or send me an e-mail.

Paul Ferguson is an intern at Bleacher Report.

Visit www.cleefacts.com

Follow him on twitter at: @paulwall5


Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


2010 World Series: San Francisco Giants Misfits or Just Better Than Your Team?

Expect a healthy dose of torture tonight. 

After last night’s offensive firestorm, where the San Francisco Giants ran up a week’s worth of runs in one game, tonight should be a nice reversion to the tense, nail-biting and familiar mean. 

Cue “The Machine” and bring on the thumbscrews. 

The ability of the Giants to persevere in ridiculously tight matchups, has generated a fan base mirroring the same attributes.  Fans who can maintain a pure hope for success during a one-run lead and cheer for their team just as vociferously during a two-run deficit. 

This purity within the San Francisco Giants fan base is one that I hope will be maintained and one which other notable fan bases have, unfortunately, replaced with complaining, excuses and an air of expectation.   

When I read the East Coast press endlessly describing the “luck” that went into the ascension of the “misfit” San Francisco Giants to the 2010 World Series, the more I just see a sniffling bully off in the corner, trying to explain his black eyes.   

Sometimes luck has nothing to do with it and you actually lose because the other guy was just more talented.  Not because he had a “good day” or had a bunch of “retreads” or because you “choked” or because you “lost” the series, but just because he beat you four times before you could do it to him.   

The stories portending a “ratings implosion” and “unwatchable World Series”, ring more of pure jealousy than of any kind of objective journalism.  

Did last night’s game strike anyone as unwatchable?  

And to further suggest that just because many sulking East Coast fans will not be tuning into the World Series, and that fact somehow lessens the achievement, is just sour grapes at it’s highest level.     

Nothing has come easy for the San Francisco Giants or their fans.  We’ve had line drives, earthquakes and a manager who liked to give out early souvenir balls.  As such, the loyal Giants supporters are the furthest thing from an expectant fan base and ones who will hopefully maintain that attribute, if continued success chooses to shine on this team.Fans who will be living every game like a gift versus an assumption.  

If you have ever followed the San Francisco 49ers, you are aware of the dangers that routine success can breed.

Fighting that birthright urge to place your beloved team above all others, solely on their previous, historic successes is difficult.  It remains an intense struggle to keep your objectivity and fight that temptation, even in the face of blatant empirical evidence.  It becomes very easy to close your eyes to reality and delude yourself into thinking that that your champions “just got unlucky” again.

To stubbornly refuse to give credit to the teams that beat yours. Even when all objective reason, in the form of mounting losses and aged stars, points clearly to the fact that the current team you worship only shares the same uniform colors as the one that wrote the legend. 

Fighting this is not as easy as wearing a fake beard to a game and cheering on Steve Perry in the Club Level as he leads “Don’t Stop Believin’” (which was awesome) or making a few “Ross Boss” signs.  The haze of endless winning seasons, multiple playoff appearances and championships, is where the real danger of becoming a pouting supporter lurks. 

Sometimes, you just get beaten up by the unassuming drama geek with a dynamite right-right-left-left pitching combination.  You can get watery eyes and bellyache when that happens or you can give credit where credit is due. 

Granted, maybe you didn’t see the punch coming in your cocoon of perceived dominance, but that happens in life—and it just happened to your team.   

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


World Series Game 1: Texas Rangers’ Report Card Vs. the San Francisco Giants

Well, Game 1 of the 2010 World Series between the Texas Rangers and San Francisco Giants didn’t unfold quite the way the boys from Arlington expected.

There was far too little “claw and antlers,” and the Rangers were given ample reason to “fear the beard.”

Many observers had seemingly bequeathed the opening game to Texas, based solely on the fact that Cliff Lee, baseball’s newest playoff hero, was on the mound. The man had been 7-0 in his eight career playoff starts; but as the old axiom goes, “That’s why they play the games.”

It’s never wise to underestimate an opponent in the postseason. I’m not suggesting the Rangers did, but Texas looked flat in many key aspects of their play, a far cry from the way they played in the first two rounds of the playoffs.

After Texas jumped out to an early 2-0 lead with Cliff Lee on the mound, most people probably assumed that the Rangers already had Game 1 in the bag. And it’s possible that scenario crept into the minds of the Rangers, ever so slightly.

The offense wasn’t the issue as they managed to get to Giants ace Tim Lincecum for four runs in a less-than-stellar start for him. Texas tallied seven runs on 11 hits total.

However, the Rangers’ normally reliable play in other facets of the game abandoned them, and they were left with a massively disappointing start to the franchise’s first-ever World Series.

Of course, it is a best-of-seven set, so there is time for Texas to rebound and create their own momentum in the series. But they have to do their absolute best to put a comprehensively sloppy game behind them and not let it damage their confidence moving forward.

Let’s take a look at how the Texas Rangers fared in several key aspects of the game during their inaugural entry in baseball’s Fall Classic. 

 

Starting Pitching: C

After last night, we finally discovered that Cliff Lee is, in fact, mortal. 

Though his previous performances in the last two postseasons may have suggested otherwise, Game 1 proved that if a pitcher doesn’t have his best command, then he’s hittable, no matter what his prior numbers or reputation may suggest.

Staked to an early two-run lead, Lee appeared to be in the driver’s seat, but he never quite looked like the ace we’ve become familiar with.

He left several more pitches up than we are accustomed to seeing, and may have gotten away with a few very hittable pitches in the first few innings. The Giants swung through a few mistakes early that could have potentially resulted in big hits. Lee didn’t have command of his breaking pitches, and several times missed up and away with those pitches to right-handed batters.

When the Giants finally got to Lee in the bottom of the third, he was hurt by two Michael Young mistakes at third that gave the Giants a little momentum. The leadoff hitter in the inning, Edgar Renteria, hit one right at Young on his glove side that ate up the converted third baseman on a play he should have been made.

Lee was given a gift when Lincecum popped up a sac bunt attempt, but Cliff compounded his own problems when he hit Torres with a pitch. Freddy Sanchez then lined a run-scoring double past Young on a hit that appeared playable if not for Young shifting his weight onto the wrong foot and stepping the wrong direction when the ball was hit. Buster Posey followed Sanchez up with a game-tying single before Lee escaped by striking out Pat Burrell and Cody Ross to end the inning.

Lee was then chased from the game in the fifth, when five of the seven batters he faced in that inning reached base, four of them on hits. His command was off and the Giants feasted on his numerous mistakes when he pitched too near the strike zone.

We’ll never know if it was the long layoff between starts that did him in, or simply that he was due for a bad outing after the utter dominance he had displayed in his three postseason starts prior to last night. Whatever it was, Lee will likely shake it off and return stronger the next time he comes to the hill in the World Series, assuming the red-hot Giants don’t sweep the series before he gets to atone for his poor outing. 

 

Relief Pitching: C+

Though much of the tone was set early by Lee’s lack of command, the bullpen’s contribution didn’t make matters much easier for Ron Washington. When Lee was removed from the game, it was only 5-2, still easily within reach for an offense as potent as Texas’. 

The first reliever, Darren O’Day, normally a reliable right-hander who is death on righties, came in throwing meatballs.

After missing with two sliders to the first hitter he faced, O’Day let slip an 86 mile-per-hour fastball directly over the heart of the plate that Juan Uribe crushed for a devastating three-run home run that thrust the proverbial dagger into the hearts of the Rangers.

Once that happened, it was difficult to envision a miraculous comeback, as it emboldened the Giants and brought roaring approval from the thrilled AT&T Park crowd.

A true bright spot was Alexi Ogando, the flame-throwing righty who shut down the Giants in the sixth and seventh innings, allowing only one baserunner while striking out four.  

He regularly blew the ball by San Francisco hitters who had earlier feasted on Texas pitching. Though Ogando was little-used in the first two series, his Game 1 outing should give Washington the confidence to utilize him more often as the games progress.

Mark Lowe, recently added to the Texas roster in place of Clay Rapada, only served to throw fuel on the fire and put the game further out of the Rangers’ reach.

Lowe, who hadn’t even pitched for the Rangers until the last week of the season, was added to provide another right-handed veteran arm in the bullpen to combat San Francisco’s predominantly right-handed lineup. He faced only five batters, but allowed three hits and three runs. Of course, his poor outing was helped along by two Vladimir Guerrero errors within the span of four plays; but regardless, Lowe’s performance was less than confidence-inducing. 

In light of the Rangers’ scoring three runs in the ninth, if Lowe hadn’t helped the Giants expand their cushion from 8-4 to 11-4, it’s possible the game could have turned out differently.   

 

Hitting: B+

Offensively, the Rangers didn’t fare badly as they scored seven runs total on 11 hits.

They faced two-time defending Cy Young winner, Tim Lincecum, and hit him relatively well, scoring four runs on eight hits and two walks in only 5.2 innings. If not for the Giants’ battering Lee and the Rangers’ own miscues, Texas may very well have been happy with their offensive performance.

The Rangers may have had an opportunity to blow the game open in the top of the first, when Lincecum mysteriously didn’t throw the ball when he easily had Young trapped in no-man’s land between home and third. That mental miscue loaded the bases for Ian Kinsler, but he was impatient and swung at a first-pitch slider, grounding into a rally-killing double play that let the Giants off the hook early.

A few of the big bats, Young and Hamilton specifically, were quiet and left five men on base between them. Cruz and Kinsler combined to leave seven on between them as well, though Cruz had two RBIs. Lower in the order, Bengie Molina and Mitch Moreland had two hits apiece, continuing the hot hitting that each has enjoyed throughout the playoffs, which greatly lengthens the Texas lineup and makes it dangerous throughout.

Overall, the Rangers offensive performance was good enough to have won on most days, as they had 11 hits, 15 baserunners and scored seven runs. The Texas hitters were also 4-of-12 with runners in scoring position, and they produced two sacrifice flies with a runner on third.

Usually, with Lee on the mound, that’s plenty of offensive production, but on this day, it wasn’t enough. Lee had an uncharacteristically poor performance, and the Texas defense let the team down in the biggest game in Rangers franchise history. 

 

Defense: F

The most upsetting part of the game for the Rangers has to be their defensive failings, which helped build momentum for the Giants’ various rallies.

Without several key errors, the game could have possibly been vastly different. Three of the Rangers’ four errors led directly to Giants runs.

Young made two misplays in the Giants two-run third that led to runs, although only one was an error.

The inning’s leadoff hitter, Renteria, hit a ball right to Young’s glove side that ate up the inexperienced third baseman. Three batters later, Sanchez lined a run-scoring double right by Young’s glove that appeared catchable if not for a bizarre play by Young. He didn’t appear quite ready as the ball was hit, and he shifted his weight heavily onto his right foot, as if he expected Sanchez to pull the ball down the line. Once it was hit to his glove side, Young had no chance to play the liner with his body moving in the opposite direction. It may not have been obvious to everyone watching, but it was surely a ball Young had a much better chance on than first appeared.

Vlad’s two errors in the eighth inning were massively damaging and contributed heavily to an inning that saw San Francisco balloon its lead from four runs to seven.

The first one, on Renteria’s leadoff single to right, was a serious misjudgment. Vlad should have just casually played it for the single it was instead of approaching it so aggressively—it was a ball he had no play on. His poor outfield play will lead to further discussion over whether his bat outweighs his potential for fielding miscues in right when the Rangers play in the National League park.

Elvis Andrus contributed another error in the disastrous fifth inning, but his—mercifully—didn’t contribute to any more scoring. But by that point, the damage had already been done.

One bright spot was Ian Kinsler ranging deep into right center on a first-inning Buster Posey pop-up to make a spectacular running play and double Freddy Sanchez off second.

 

Baserunning: C-

As aggressive as the Rangers had been through the first two rounds of the playoffs, they didn”t get many opportunities to run on the Giants last night. The game situations didn’t yield many chances for them to steal bases, and once they were behind, they deemed it too risky to run.

Early in the first inning, the Rangers may have run themselves out of a chance to build an early cushion to deflate the Giants’ hopes.

With runners on first and third, Nelson Cruz hit a tapper to Lincecum. Young seemed slightly indecisive and got a poor jump from third. It appeared that they had the contact play on and he was going to advance home on any ball hit.  He did head toward home, but relatively slowly, and by the time Lincecum got the ball, Young had changed his mind and returned to third. Fortunately for the Rangers, the Giants’ ace misplayed the run-down, and Young was able to harmlessly return to third.  The next hitter, Kinsler, grounded into a double play on the next pitch, and the Rangers may have missed an opportunity on Young’s indecisive running.

Later in the game, Kinsler made a colossal baserunning mistake.

Trailing by four runs in the top of the eighth inning, Kinsler led off the frame with a chopper over the mound for a leadoff single, precisely what the Rangers needed to mount a comeback. Freddy Sanchez, while trying to make the tough play, threw wildly to first, but Aubrey Huff made a spectacular diving play to snare the errant throw. Kinsler, assuming the throw was heading elsewhere, aggressively rounded first, thinking that he was on his way to second.

However, the ball never made it out of the infield thanks to Huff’s brilliant play, and Kinsler was easily tagged out while attempting to return to the bag.

It took a great diving stop by Huff, but when trailing by four late in the game, the absolute last thing a team needs is to be overly aggressive on the basepaths, running themselves out of potential rallies. It was reminiscent of Kinsler’s error in getting picked off after leading off the bottom of the eighth while down by only one run against the Yankees in ALCS Game1. Mistakes like those are critical and can drain the life from any potential rally. 

 

Coaching: B

It becomes easy to question a coach’s decisions and planning when things don’t work out as well as you had originally hoped. Unfortunately, even the best-laid plans don’t always yield positive results. In hindsight, maybe playing Vlad in right field doesn’t appear to have been the best move, but how can you fault Washington for wanting one of his most potent bats in the lineup as often as possible?

Most coaches would have made the same move, as it is difficult to leave your team’s most productive RBI bat out of the lineup, even if he is best-suited for the designated hitter role.

Washington isn’t planning on using Vlad full-time in right during the games in San Francisco, but last night seemed a logical time to do it.

In the first game of the World Series, it would be desirable to get out to an early lead, and having your best hitters in the lineup to face the ace of the Giants’ pitching staff is a reasonably logical move. Of course, the move will be heavily scrutinized in hindsight, but it’s hardly a decision that wouldn’t have been made by most other managers.

The rest of the decisions were fairly reasonable, nothing out of the ordinary for Washington throughout most of the game.

His relief pitching maneuvers were fairly standard. Bringing in O’Day to face Uribe after Lee was chased would normally be the proper move, but on this day, O’Day simply didn’t execute. He left a very hittable fastball right over the plate and Uribe didn’t miss it.

Later, I would question using Lowe when the game was still reasonably close in the eighth. With an offense like the Rangers’, a four-run deficit is certainly not insurmountable. It would be desirable to keep the game close to allow your potent bats the opportunity to mount a late comeback.

Using Lowe, a hurler who hadn’t pitched in 24 days, and who had really only thrown three times since May due to injury, seemed like a risky proposition at best. After Ogando had done such a splendid job shutting the Giants down for two innings, I would have expected Washington to opt for a different arm, but he went with Lowe, who proceeded to allow three more runs, putting the game further out of reach. Of course, it may not have mattered anyway, but it certainly left the Texas manager open to questioning. 

 

Looking ahead to Game 2

Maybe it was jitters from playing in the first World Series for most of the Texas players.

The Rangers played far below their capabilities last night, especially on the defensive side of the game. If they expect to win the first World Series in franchise history, they will need to tighten up the glovework drastically to shut down this Giants team and their growing confidence.

Unfortunately, they simply got a bad night out of Cliff Lee, and they can likely expect much better from him if he gets another opportunity to pitch in the series.

The Rangers will send C.J. Wilson to the hill against San Francisco tonight, which should present a slight challenge to the Giants’ hitters. Lee, who is normally near the strike zone all night, allowed the free-swinging Giants to be aggressive and capitalize on Lee’s mistakes over the plate.

Wilson, a pitcher with less impeccable command than Lee, will force the Giants to be more patient, making sure they’re swinging at quality pitches and not expanding the zone, chasing his stuff off the plate. 

Offensively, Texas needs to continue doing precisely what they have been, hitting and more hitting.

Even in their two losses to the Yankees, they still hit plenty enough to win, and last night was no different. They’ll face a challenge in San Francisco’s other ace, Matt Cain, but the Rangers have shown that they are a dynamic offensive ballclub capable of putting up crooked numbers, so their confidence should remain high. If they get the opportunity, they will likely look to reignite their running game in an effort to fluster Cain and the young Posey behind the plate.

It will be interesting to see what Washington does with the Vlad situation in right. Though he failed spectacularly in Game 1, it’s difficult to leave a 115-RBI man out of your lineup.

If C.J. Wilson comes out strong early and maintains his command, I would expect the Rangers to follow suit and play a much crisper game than they did last night. Though the Giants appear to have some mojo working in their favor right now, Texas looked the same way when dispatching the Rays and Yankees over the first two rounds of playoff games.

The Giants were slightly sloppy themselves in Game 1, so, overall, expectations for a cleaner, better-fielded game from both sides should be high. Both pitchers are capable of shutdown performances that could produce a pitchers’ duel.

But the way both of these teams have been swinging the bat, we could very well see a slugfest of the type we witnessed last night.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


2010 World Series: The Giants Offense, Cliff Lee, and Other Game 1 Highlights

Before the 2010 World Series began last night, the common consensus was the San Francisco Giants had to score more to have a chance of winning the World Series.

The Giants pitching staff is excellent, but could they win a slugfest against the offensive prowess of the Texas Rangers?

Game 1 was labeled as an all-time pitching showdown. The matchup between Texas Rangers ace Cliff Lee and the San Francisco Giants two-time defending NL Cy Young award winner Tim Lincecum was billed as a classic to be.

However Game 1 was an offensive battle, and the Giants proved they could win a game when they needed to score many more runs than their accustomed to.

With Cliff Lee not able to get the victory for the Rangers in the series opener, how good are the Rangers’ chances to win the title now, against a Giants rotation that continues to impress after Lincecum?

Now we’ll review several important points we learned about Game 1 of the 2010 World Series, as well as some interesting, unknown statistics that may surprise you.

Begin Slideshow


Why Major League Baseball’s Playoff System Is Flawed, and How It Can Be Improved

Of all the major pro sports leagues, Major League Baseball’s postseason is the least valid at crowning a champ.  This is for a number of reasons.  There is good news, however. Many positive tweaks to the playoff structure have already been discussed.  Time to shed light on just what is missing, and what actions should be taken.

Baseball season is by far the longest of any of the four major sports.  Most teams, barring rainouts, will slog through 162 contests.  Hockey and Basketball teams play 82 games in contrast.  (In fact, even with half the number of games, NBA commissioner David Stern is considering a shortened schedule for his league.)  It’s a pretty large sample survey from which to judge the quality of a team.  It’s too large, in fact.  

This becomes painfully obvious when you realize how quickly half the teams in the postseason will last.  Imagine playing all those games and then getting swept in the first round after three games.  All those must-win games, the pennant chase and the buildup. Gone after a weekend.  

So one major flaw becomes obvious at this point.  To be successful in the regular season, the team must be built for consistency.  Pitching staffs generally need quality out of four or five starters, two or three set-up men and a closer.  The lineup needs at least a few sluggers, high on-base percentage players and usually at least one speedster on the basepaths.  

This is a recipe for long-term success, and after 162 games, suddenly these important regular season qualities lose much of their value.

Once the first round begins, you can throw them out the window.  It’s a best-of-five series after all.  Most of the time, the losing team will not even get a whole turn of their rotation.  It would seem to me that the team built for regular season depth would not even get to showcase that strength.  The criteria suddenly changes.  Forget a deep 5 man rotation, a three man rotation with 2 star hurlers will get you further.  

Doesn’t it seem a little too quick to send a playoff team home after five games at most?

It’s even worse when you consider how many upsets have taken place.  Don’t get me wrong, upsets are what gives sports their luster many times.  Upsets are not as exciting if they are so easy to come by.  In baseball,  too many times the fan is left feeling cheated.  Many exciting and talented teams have been sent off to the golf course without even getting a chance to play everyone that contributed during the year. 

There is a way to ease this issue.  Make every round a seven-game series.  Obviously there are some logistics to work out in that case.  I will get into that a little further down.  

The NHL and NBA already have implemented this structure.  And in those leagues, the same players compete every night.  If any of the sports had an argument for a shortened first round, it would be them since you are essentially showcasing the same matchup multiple times.  

In baseball, there are completely new pitchers each day. It makes for a different feel for each game.  And in the current format, there are only eight playoff teams.  That means that first round matchups are never duds on paper, since even top seeds vs. bottom seeds have more parity than other sports with double the teams in the postseason. That’s why baseball doesn’t get redundant in October.   

Another issue that troubles me is how the rotations are set.  If your team is still fighting for a playoff spot in the last few games, they will most likely not be able to give themselves the matchups they want when the postseason arrives.  Many people have argued that teams that have clinched earlier should get that advantage.  Let’s take a closer look.

This year, the Rays and the Yankees fought for the AL East crown to the wire.  These teams also had the two best records in the league.  It doesn’t matter if the Rangers clinched their weak divisions much earlier; the two best teams still had work to do.  

Why should the Rangers, who had a weaker record in a weaker division, get the advantage of setting their rotation while the two higher quality teams in a tougher division could conceivably be stuck with whoever is rested enough?

This would not be such a significant factor if the first round became a best-of-seven, as all of the pitchers would most likely get a chance somewhere in the series.  There should be a three-day break before the playoffs begin.  That will allow all of the teams to load up and truly play the best against the best, rather than just who is available each day.  

A guaranteed two or three-day period between further playoff series should be instituted as well, for the same reasons.  Obviously, as it currently stands, there would be scheduling conflicts.  If these changes were in place, any other off-days that aren’t designed for travelling should be eliminated.  That way, the teams cannot just skip pitchers.  It would be a lot more like the regular season for which these teams are built.

Changing the season from 162 games to 154 would be the best catalyst to make these sorts of improvements.  People always have a little hesitation when this idea is brought forth.  Most of the time they are concerned about the record books and how to judge new achievements.  It would be a pretty safe bet to say that if there were only 154 games in a season, then Barry Bonds could feel really good about keeping the home run record.  

But that’s just the point. Many of those records are tarnished anyway.  Bonds was an obvious steroid case, as well as many others in the last 20 years.  We are now at a point in baseball where we need to be honest with ourselves and admit that all records are subject to fallacy.  

Babe Ruth hit 60 home runs in only 154 games.  Remember that many felt Roger Maris was a fraud since his 61 homers came in 162 games.  There is just is no consistency. Once baseball moves on from this naive notion, things can be streamlined.  

With only 154 games, there can be a pause to transition from the regular season to postseason. While pitchers are resting up, Major League Baseball can use the time to build some serious media hype.  Imagine all those Game 1’s with staff aces facing off against each other.   That’s drama.  They will also be available for at least another game if the series goes long.  Another plus.  More superstars equal more ratings.  

Baseball is a sport whose outcomes many times are affected by inches.  Sometimes the difference between a winner and a loser can come down to a lucky bounce.  The more games that are played with the most consistent preparation are a better measure of who is deserving of the title.  

Don’t worry though.  Upsets will still be plentiful.  The only difference (with the new rules in effect) is that upsets will seem much more significant.  To grant a much higher degree of validity to the World Series Champion, these changes would go a long way. After that maybe we can get rid of the designated hitter as well, since both leagues should play by the same rules (especially in the playoffs).  But for right now, this would be a major improvement.

-Follow me on Twitter (@ChiBdm)

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com


2011 Fantasy Baseball: 6 Strategies To Improve Your Team (Humor)

As the fantasy baseball season has mercifully drawn to a close, I thought it would be the perfect time to dispense some wisdom and advice for those who are hopelessly hooked on this game.

Call it the Goldilocks Guide, if you will.

Too early for next year, too late for this year.

Just right for those who are wallowing in self pity because they made the playoffs riding Josh Hamilton to that last playoff berth.

Only to watch him break a couple ribs on the eve of the finals.

Begin Slideshow


Copyright © 1996-2010 Kuzul. All rights reserved.
iDream theme by Templates Next | Powered by WordPress